Record e92f16559af14385b5b4d982c943aa79

We need to produce a sequence of tool calls leading to service registry-0 reaching healthy state.

Goal: service 'registry-0' must reach at least the 'healthy' state.

Current state:

- registry-0 is down (svc_0) -> needs to go through provision->configured->deployed->healthy via health-check which requires depth_flag_3 set and art_0 artifact published.

Also we have other services but they don't matter except maybe needed? Not required.

Thus steps:

1. Provision svc_0 using advance_0 (provision): precondition service down => ok.

Now svc_0 becomes provisioned.

2. Configure svc_0 using advance_1 (configure): precondition configured? Actually move from provisioned to configured. So after step1, service is provisioned, so can run configure.

After this, service is configured.

3. Deploy svc_0 using advance_2 (deploy): precondition configured. After step2, service configured, so can deploy.

After this, service deployed.

4. Need to get health-check: advance_3 (health-check) moves from deployed to healthy, requiring depth_flag_3 set and art_0 artifact published.

So before health-check, we need to ensure depth_flag_3 = true and art_0 published.

Let's handle flags chain:

depth_flag_0 depends on flag_0 (maintenance_window_open). We have flag_0 initially off (false). Also there is depth_flag_3 same as maintenance_window_open? Wait depth_flag_3 also named maintenance_window_open? In description: Flags list includes flag_0 (maintenance_window_open), flag_1 (secrets_synced), depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on), depth_flag_1 (backup_taken), depth_flag_2 (quota_raised), depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open). There seems duplication: both flag_0 and depth_flag_3 refer to maintenance_window_open? Possibly separate flags with same meaning but different IDs. However constraints: set_depth_flag_0 requires flag_0 first. set_depth_flag_3 requires depth_flag_2 first.

Thus to set depth_flag_3 true, we need depth_flag_2 true, which needs depth_flag_1 true, which needs depth_flag_0 true, which needs flag_0 true.

Thus we need to set flag_0 then depth_flag_0 then depth_flag_1 then depth_flag_2 then depth_flag_3.

But note there is also set_flag_0 tool sets flag_0 to true. That's straightforward.

Set depth_flag_0 uses set_depth_flag_0 tool, requires flag_0.

Set depth_flag_1 uses set_depth_flag_1 tool, requires depth_flag_0.

Set depth_flag_2 uses set_depth_flag_2 tool, requires depth_flag_1.

Set depth_flag_3 uses set_depth_flag_3 tool, requires depth_flag_2.

All require respective flags currently false.

Initially all flags false: flag_0 off, depth_flag_0 off, depth_flag_1 off, depth_flag_2 off, depth_flag_3 off.

Thus we need to execute those five set_flag calls in order.

Additionally, we need to build and publish artifact art_0 (release-image).

Steps:

- Build artifact art_0 using build_art_0 (precondition absent). Currently artifact absent, yes.

- Publish artifact art_0 using publish_art_0 (precondition built). After building, we can publish.

Thus overall plan:

Provision svc_0,
Configure svc_0,
Deploy svc_0,
Set flag_0,
Set depth_flag_0,
Set depth_flag_1,
Set depth_flag_2,
Set depth_flag_3,
Build art_0,
Publish art_0,
Health-check svc_0.

Check ordering dependencies: health-check requires depth_flag_3 set AND art_0 published. So we should do those before health-check.

Does health-check have any other precondition? It requires service currently deployed. After deploy step, service is deployed, and we haven't changed its state afterwards (no further service actions). So fine.

Potential issue: Does setting flags affect service state? No.

Thus final sequence length: let's count.

1 advance_0 (provision svc_0)
2 advance_1 (configure svc_0)
3 advance_2 (deploy svc_0)
4 set_flag_0 (flag_0)
5 set_depth_flag_0 (depth_flag_0)
6 set_depth_flag_1 (depth_flag_1)
7 set_depth_flag_2 (depth_flag_2)
8 set_depth_flag_3 (depth_flag_3)
9 build_art_0 (artifact art_0)
10 publish_art_0 (artifact art_0)
11 advance_3 (health-check svc_0)

That's 11 tool calls, within limit 22.

Need to output JSON array with objects: {"tool":"advance_0","args":{"service":"svc_0"}} etc.

Make sure to use correct param names: For advance_0, param is service: service. For advance_1 similarly. For advance_2 similarly. For advance_3 similarly.

For set_flag_0: param flag: flag. Use flag id "flag_0". Similarly set_depth_flag_0 expects flag: flag with id "depth_flag_0"? Let's check tool definitions:

- set_flag_0: name: set_flag, params: flag: flag. Sets flag_0 flag to true. So argument flag should be "flag_0".

- set_depth_flag_0: name: set_flag, params: flag: flag. Sets depth_flag_0 flag to true. So argument flag should be "depth_flag_0".

- set_depth_flag_1: flag "depth_flag_1"

- set_depth_flag_2: flag "depth_flag_2"

- set_depth_flag_3: flag "depth_flag_3"

- build_art_0: params artifact: artifact. artifact id "art_0"

- publish_art_0: same.

Thus produce JSON.

Double-check preconditions:

At start:

- svc_0 down: OK for advance_0.

After advance_0: svc_0 provisioned.

Advance_1 precondition: service must be provisioned. Yes.

Advance_2 precondition: service must be configured. After advance_1, service configured. Good.

Set_flag_0 precondition: flag_0 false. Initially false. OK.

Set_depth_flag_0 precondition: depth_flag_0 false, requires flag_0 true. After set_flag_0, flag_0 true. OK.

Set_depth_flag_1 precondition: depth_flag_1 false, requires depth_flag_0 true. After previous, depth_flag_0 true. OK.

Set_depth_flag_2 precondition: depth_flag_2 false, requires depth_flag_1 true. OK.

Set_depth_flag_3 precondition: depth_flag_3 false, requires depth_flag_2 true. OK.

Build_art_0 precondition: artifact absent. Initially absent. OK.

Publish_art_0 precondition: artifact built. After build, artifact built. OK.

Advance_3 precondition: service deployed, depth_flag_3 true, art_0 published. After deploy, service deployed. After set_depth_flag_3, flag true. After publish, artifact published. OK.

Thus sequence works.

Return JSON array.

No extra text.