Record a6f708fdcf8f469a99517ba31ed2195a

We need to produce a sequence of tool calls leading to ingest-0 being healthy.

Goal: service 'ingest-0' (svc_0) must be at least healthy.

Current state:

- ingest-0 is down (not yet provisioned). So we need to provision -> configured -> deployed -> healthy.

But there are dependencies: health-check requires depth_flag_4 flag set AND art_0 artifact published.

Thus before health-check we need to have built/published art_0, and set depth flags up to depth_flag_4.

Also note other services? Not needed but maybe they affect something else? No.

Let's list all relevant entities:

Service states: each can be down/provisioned/configured/deployed/healthy.

Currently both services down.

Artifact states: absent/built/published.

Flag booleans: initially all false.

Depth flags chain: To set depth_flag_0 require flag_0 set first. Then depth_flag_1 requires depth_flag_0. Depth_flag_2 requires depth_flag_1. Depth_flag_3 requires depth_flag_2. Depth_flag_4 requires depth_flag_3.

So we need to set flag_0 then depth_flag_0 etc.

flag_0 corresponds to maintenance_window_open? Actually flag_0 is maintenance_window_open per entity IDs mapping: Flags: flag_0 (maintenance_window_open), flag_1 (secrets_synced), depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on), depth_flag_1 (backup_taken), depth_flag_2 (quota_raised), depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open), depth_flag_4 (secrets_synced).

Interesting duplication: flag_0 = maintenance_window_open, depth_flag_3 also maintenance_window_open, flag_1 = secrets_synced, depth_flag_4 also secrets_synced. But anyway.

Preconditions: For setting depth_flag_0 we need flag_0 true. Setting depth_flag_1 needs depth_flag_0 true. And so on.

Thus steps:

1. set_flag_0 (to make maintenance_window_open true)
2. set_depth_flag_0 (requires flag_0)
3. set_depth_flag_1 (requires depth_flag_0)
4. set_depth_flag_2 (requires depth_flag_1)
5. set_depth_flag_3 (requires depth_flag_2)
6. set_depth_flag_4 (requires depth_flag_3)

Now after those, we can do health-check if artifact published.

Need to build and publish art_0.

Steps for artifact:

7. build_art_0 (precond: artifact absent)
8. publish_art_0 (precond: built)

Now we need to get service to healthy.

Provision, configure, deploy, health-check.

9. advance_0 (provision) for svc_0 (ingest-0): moves down->provisioned.
10. advance_1 (configure) for svc_0: provisioned->configured.
11. advance_2 (deploy) for svc_0: configured->deployed.
12. advance_3 (health-check) for svc_0: deployed->healthy, requiring depth_flag_4 true and art_0 published.

All good.

Check ordering constraints: We could intermix artifact building with flag setting as long as prerequisites satisfied. Since health-check requires both depth_flag_4 and artifact published, we should ensure both done before health-check.

Our plan sets flags first, then builds artifact, then provisions service, configures, deploys, health-check.

Potential issue: Does provisioning service require any flags? No precondition only service down.

Does configuring or deploying require any flags? No.

Thus fine.

Make sure we don't exceed 24 calls: we have 12 calls.

Now verify each tool's preconditions given current state evolves.

Start: All flags false, artifacts absent, services down.

Step1: set_flag_0 (flag_0). Precondition: flag_0 false => ok. After: flag_0 true.

Step2: set_depth_flag_0 (depth_flag_0). Precondition: depth_flag_0 false, requires flag_0 true => ok. After depth_flag_0 true.

Step3: set_depth_flag_1 (depth_flag_1). Precondition: depth_flag_1 false, requires depth_flag_0 true => ok.

Step4: set_depth_flag_2 (depth_flag_2). Precondition: depth_flag_2 false, requires depth_flag_1 true => ok.

Step5: set_depth_flag_3 (depth_flag_3). Precondition: depth_flag_3 false, requires depth_flag_2 true => ok.

Step6: set_depth_flag_4 (depth_flag_4). Precondition: depth_flag_4 false, requires depth_flag_3 true => ok.

Step7: build_art_0 (artifact art_0). Precondition: artifact absent => ok. After built.

Step8: publish_art_0 (artifact art_0). Precondition: built => ok. After published.

Step9: advance_0 (service svc_0). Precondition: service down => ok. After provisioned.

Step10: advance_1 (service svc_0). Precondition: provisioned => ok. After configured.

Step11: advance_2 (service svc_0). Precondition: configured => ok. After deployed.

Step12: advance_3 (service svc_0). Precondition: deployed, requires depth_flag_4 true and art_0 published => both true now. After healthy.

Goal achieved.

Thus output JSON array of objects with tool and args.

Tool IDs exactly as given: set_flag_0, set_depth_flag_0, set_depth_flag_1, set_depth_flag_2, set_depth_flag_3, set_depth_flag_4, build_art_0, publish_art_0, advance_0, advance_1, advance_2, advance_3.

Args: For set_flag_0: {"flag": "flag_0"}? Wait param name is flag: flag. The tool expects parameter "flag": flag entity id. According to spec: set_flag_0 name: set_flag | params: flag: flag. So we pass flag: "flag_0". Similarly for depth flags: flag: "depth_flag_0" etc.

For build_art_0: {"artifact": "art_0"}.

publish_art_0: same.

advance_0 etc: {"service": "svc_0"}.

Check that we used correct entity IDs: Services: svc_0 (ingest-0), svc_1 (ledger-1). Artifacts: art_0 (release-image), art_1 (db-migration). Flags: flag_0 (maintenance_window_open), flag_1 (secrets_synced), depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on), depth_flag_1 (backup_taken), depth_flag_2 (quota_raised), depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open), depth_flag_4 (secrets_synced).

Thus correct.

Now produce JSON array.

No extra text.