Record b40feaf995ee4d7fbedc5fe8ceb03085

We need to produce a JSON array of tool calls that will achieve the goal: service 'auth-api-0' must reach at least the 'healthy' state. Use exact entity IDs: services svc_0 (auth-api-0), svc_1 (webhooks-1); artifacts art_0 (release-image), art_1 (db-migration); flags: flag_0 (maintenance_window_open), flag_1 (secrets_synced), depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on), depth_flag_1 (backup_taken), depth_flag_2 (quota_raised), depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open), depth_flag_4 (secrets_synced). Note there are duplicate flag names? Actually flag_0 and depth_flag_3 both refer to maintenance_window_open? The description says depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open). So we have flag_0 (maintenance_window_open) and depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open). Also depth_flag_4 (secrets_synced). So we have multiple flags.

Goal: service auth-api-0 must reach at least 'healthy' state. That means we need to get it to healthy via health-check tool (advance_3) which requires service to be deployed, and depth_flag_4 flag set, and art_0 artifact published. Also health-check moves from deployed to healthy.

We need to get auth-api-0 from down to provisioned via advance_0 (provision). Then configure via advance_1 (configure) to configured. Then deploy via advance_2 (deploy) to deployed. Then health-check via advance_3 (health-check) to healthy. But health-check requires depth_flag_4 flag set and art_0 published. depth_flag_4 is secrets_synced flag (depth_flag_4). It requires depth_flag_3 flag first (maintenance_window_open). depth_flag_3 requires depth_flag_2 flag first (quota_raised). depth_flag_2 requires depth_flag_1 flag first (backup_taken). depth_flag_1 requires depth_flag_0 flag first (feature_gate_on). depth_flag_0 requires flag_0 flag first (maintenance_window_open). flag_0 flag can be set via set_flag_0 (set_flag) which sets flag_0 to true, precondition: currently false. So we need to set flag_0 true first, then depth_flag_0 true, then depth_flag_1 true, then depth_flag_2 true, then depth_flag_3 true, then depth_flag_4 true. Also need to publish artifact art_0 (release-image) which requires it to be built first (build_art_0) which requires it to be absent (which it is). Then publish_art_0 moves it to published. So we need to build and publish art_0.

We also need to ensure we don't exceed 24 calls. Let's count needed calls.

Sequence:

1. set_flag_0 (set flag_0 to true) - precondition: flag_0 currently false. It is off. So call set_flag_0 with flag: flag_0.

2. set_depth_flag_0 (set depth_flag_0 to true) - precondition: depth_flag_0 currently false, requires depth_flag_0? Actually precondition: it must currently be false. Requires the depth_flag_0 flag first? Wait description: "Requires the depth_flag_0 flag first." Actually the tool set_depth_flag_0 has precondition: it must currently be false. Requires the flag_0 flag first. So after setting flag_0, we can set depth_flag_0.

3. set_depth_flag_1 (set depth_flag_1 to true) - precondition: currently false, requires depth_flag_1? Actually requires depth_flag_1? Wait description: "Requires the depth_flag_1 flag first." Actually set_depth_flag_1 requires depth_flag_1? Let's read: "id: set_depth_flag_1 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag". Actually that's generic. But there is also "Requires the depth_flag_1 flag first." Actually the description for set_depth_flag_1 says "Requires the depth_flag_1 flag first." That seems contradictory. Let's parse each:

- set_depth_flag_0: "Requires the depth_flag_0 flag first." Actually it says "Requires the depth_flag_0 flag first." That seems like a mistake; maybe they meant requires flag_0 flag first. Indeed earlier they said "Requires the depth_flag_0 flag first." Actually the description: "id: set_depth_flag_0 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag". "Precondition: it must currently be false. Requires the depth_flag_0 flag first." That seems like a mistake; maybe they meant "Requires the flag_0 flag first." Actually earlier they listed "Requires the depth_flag_0 flag first." But we have depth_flag_0 is a flag itself; maybe they meant "Requires the flag_0 flag first." Let's interpret: set_depth_flag_0 sets depth_flag_0, precondition: currently false, requires the flag_0 flag first. So after flag_0 is true, we can set depth_flag_0.

- set_depth_flag_1: "Precondition: it must currently be false. Requires the depth_flag_1 flag first." That seems like a mistake; maybe they meant "Requires the depth_flag_1 flag first"? Actually they probably meant "Requires the depth_flag_1 flag first"? That doesn't make sense. Let's read the original list:

```
- id: set_depth_flag_1 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag
    Set the depth_flag_1 flag to true. Precondition: it must currently be false. Requires the depth_flag_1 flag first.
- id: set_depth_flag_2 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag
    Set the depth_flag_2 flag to true. Precondition: it must currently be false. Requires the depth_flag_2 flag first.
- id: set_depth_flag_3 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag
    Set the depth_flag_3 flag to true. Precondition: it must currently be false. Requires the depth_flag_3 flag first.
- id: set_depth_flag_4 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag
    Set the depth_flag_4 flag to true. Precondition: it must currently be false. Requires the depth_flag_4 flag first.
```

But earlier they also listed "Requires the depth_flag_0 flag first." for set_depth_flag_0. Actually they might have meant "Requires the flag_0 flag first." But they wrote "depth_flag_0 flag first." Possibly they meant "Requires the flag_0 flag first." So the dependency chain is: flag_0 -> depth_flag_0 -> depth_flag_1 -> depth_flag_2 -> depth_flag_3 -> depth_flag_4. That matches typical depth flags.

Thus we need to set depth_flag_0, then depth_flag_1, then depth_flag_2, then depth_flag_3, then depth_flag_4. Each requires the previous depth flag to be set? Actually each requires the previous depth flag? Let's interpret: set_depth_flag_1 requires depth_flag_1? That doesn't make sense. Probably they meant "Requires the depth_flag_0 flag first." for set_depth_flag_1? Actually they might have mis-indexed: set_depth_flag_1 requires depth_flag_0? Let's think: The depth flags are depth_flag_0, depth_flag_1, depth_flag_2, depth_flag_3, depth_flag_4. The dependencies likely are: depth_flag_0 depends on flag_0; depth_flag_1 depends on depth_flag_0; depth_flag_2 depends on depth_flag_1; depth_flag_3 depends on depth_flag_2; depth_flag_4 depends on depth_flag_3. That would make sense: each deeper flag requires the previous depth flag to be set. So set_depth_flag_1 requires depth_flag_0 to be set first. But the description says "Requires the depth_flag_1 flag first." That seems like a copy-paste error. But we can infer the intended dependency chain: depth_flag_0 requires flag_0; depth_flag_1 requires depth_flag_0; depth_flag_2 requires depth_flag_1; depth_flag_3 requires depth_flag_2; depth_flag_4 requires depth_flag_3. So we need to set them in order.

Thus we need to call:

- set_flag_0 (set flag_0 true)
- set_depth_flag_0 (set depth_flag_0 true) (precondition: currently false, requires flag_0 true)
- set_depth_flag_1 (set depth_flag_1 true) (requires depth_flag_0 true)
- set_depth_flag_2 (set depth_flag_2 true) (requires depth_flag_1 true)
- set_depth_flag_3 (set depth_flag_3 true) (requires depth_flag_2 true)
- set_depth_flag_4 (set depth_flag_4 true) (requires depth_flag_3 true)

Now we also need to build and publish artifact art_0:

- build_art_0 (build artifact) (precondition: artifact must be absent) -> moves from absent to built.
- publish_art_0 (publish artifact) (precondition: artifact must be built) -> moves to published.

Now we need to provision auth-api-0:

- advance_0 (provision) (precondition: service must be down) -> moves to provisioned.

Then configure:

- advance_1 (configure) (precondition: service must be provisioned) -> moves to configured.

Then deploy:

- advance_2 (deploy) (precondition: service must be configured) -> moves to deployed.

Then health-check:

- advance_3 (health-check) (precondition: service must be deployed, requires depth_flag_4 flag set, requires art_0 artifact published) -> moves to healthy.

Thus total calls: set_flag_0, set_depth_flag_0, set_depth_flag_1, set_depth_flag_2, set_depth_flag_3, set_depth_flag_4, build_art_0, publish_art_0, advance_0, advance_1, advance_2, advance_3. That's 11 calls. Within 24 limit.

We must ensure we use exact tool IDs as given:

- set_flag_0 tool id: set_flag_0 (name: set_flag, params: flag: flag). So we call with {"flag":"flag_0"}.

- set_depth_flag_0 tool id: set_depth_flag_0 (name: set_flag, params: flag: flag). So call with {"flag":"depth_flag_0"}.

- set_depth_flag_1 tool id: set_depth_flag_1 (name: set_flag, params: flag: flag). So call with {"flag":"depth_flag_1"}.

- set_depth_flag_2 tool id: set_depth_flag_2 (name: set_flag, params: flag: flag). So call with {"flag":"depth_flag_2"}.

- set_depth_flag_3 tool id: set_depth_flag_3 (name: set_flag, params: flag: flag). So call with {"flag":"depth_flag_3"}.

- set_depth_flag_4 tool id: set_depth_flag_4 (name: set_flag, params: flag: flag). So call with {"flag":"depth_flag_4"}.

- build_art_0 tool id: build_art_0 (name: build_artifact, params: artifact: artifact). So call with {"artifact":"art_0"}.

- publish_art_0 tool id: publish_art_0 (name: publish_artifact, params: artifact: artifact). So call with {"artifact":"art_0"}.

- advance_0 tool id: advance_0 (name: provision, params: service: service). So call with {"service":"svc_0"}.

- advance_1 tool id: advance_1 (name: configure, params: service: service). So call with {"service":"svc_0"}.

- advance_2 tool id: advance_2 (name: deploy, params: service: service). So call with {"service":"svc_0"}.

- advance_3 tool id: advance_3 (name: health-check, params: service: service). So call with {"service":"svc_0"}.

We must ensure the order respects dependencies.

Sequence:

1. set_flag_0 (set flag_0 true)
2. set_depth_flag_0 (set depth_flag_0 true) (requires flag_0 true)
3. set_depth_flag_1 (set depth_flag_1 true) (requires depth_flag_0 true)
4. set_depth_flag_2 (set depth_flag_2 true) (requires depth_flag_1 true)
5. set_depth_flag_3 (set depth_flag_3 true) (requires depth_flag_2 true)
6. set_depth_flag_4 (set depth_flag_4 true) (requires depth_flag_3 true)
7. build_art_0 (build artifact art_0) (artifact must be absent)
8. publish_art_0 (publish artifact art_0) (artifact must be built)
9. advance_0 (provision svc_0) (service must be down)
10. advance_1 (configure svc_0) (service must be provisioned)
11. advance_2 (deploy svc_0) (service must be configured)
12. advance_3 (health-check svc_0) (service must be deployed, depth_flag_4 true, art_0 published)

Thus we have 12 calls.

Check preconditions:

- set_flag_0: flag_0 currently false, precondition satisfied. After call, flag_0 becomes true.

- set_depth_flag_0: precondition: currently false (depth_flag_0 is false), requires flag_0 flag first (which we set). So after step 1, flag_0 true, so step 2 can be called. After step 2, depth_flag_0 becomes true.

- set_depth_flag_1: precondition: currently false (depth_flag_1 false), requires depth_flag_0 flag first (which we set). So step 3 after step 2 is okay. After step 3, depth_flag_1 true.

- set_depth_flag_2: precondition: currently false, requires depth_flag_1 flag first. So step 4 after step 3 okay. After step 4, depth_flag_2 true.

- set_depth_flag_3: precondition: currently false, requires depth_flag_2 flag first. So step 5 after step 4 okay. After step 5, depth_flag_3 true.

- set_depth_flag_4: precondition: currently false, requires depth_flag_3 flag first. So step 6 after step 5 okay. After step 6, depth_flag_4 true.

- build_art_0: precondition: artifact must be absent. art_0 is absent initially. So okay. After step 7, artifact becomes built.

- publish_art_0: precondition: artifact must be built. After step 7, built, so step 8 okay. After step 8, artifact becomes published.

- advance_0: precondition: service must be down. svc_0 is down initially. So okay. After step 9, service becomes provisioned.

- advance_1: precondition: service must be provisioned. After step 9, provisioned, so okay. After step 10, service becomes configured.

- advance_2: precondition: service must be configured. After step 10, configured, so okay. After step 11, service becomes deployed.

- advance_3: precondition: service must be deployed, requires depth_flag_4 flag set, requires art_0 artifact published. After steps 6 and 8, both are true. So step 12 okay. After step 12, service becomes healthy.

Thus the plan works.

Now we must output only a JSON array of tool calls, each object with "tool": "<tool id>", "args": { ... }. No extra text.

Thus output:

[
  {"tool":"set_flag_0","args":{"flag":"flag_0"}},
  {"tool":"set_depth_flag_0","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_0"}},
  {"tool":"set_depth_flag_1","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_1"}},
  {"tool":"set_depth_flag_2","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_2"}},
  {"tool":"set_depth_flag_3","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_3"}},
  {"tool":"set_depth_flag_4","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_4"}},
  {"tool":"build_art_0","args":{"artifact":"art_0"}},
  {"tool":"publish_art_0","args":{"artifact":"art_0"}},
  {"tool":"advance_0","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
  {"tool":"advance_1","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
  {"tool":"advance_2","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
  {"tool":"advance_3","args":{"service":"svc_0"}}
]

Make sure JSON array is valid, no trailing commas. Provide exactly that.

Check tool IDs: Are they exactly as given? The tool catalog lists:

- id: set_flag_0 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag

- id: set_depth_flag_0 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag

- id: set_depth_flag_1 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag

- id: set_depth_flag_2 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag

- id: set_depth_flag_3 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag

- id: set_depth_flag_4 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag

- id: build_art_0 | name: build_artifact | params: artifact: artifact

- id: publish_art_0 | name: publish_artifact | params: artifact: artifact

- id: advance_0 | name: provision | params: service: service

- id: advance_1 | name: configure | params: service: service

- id: advance_2 | name: deploy | params: service: service

- id: advance_3 | name: health-check | params: service: service

Thus the IDs are correct.

Thus final answer is the JSON array.