Data to …… trials

Record a88b7fd3f3ba4320bd4a05d56b2e19d8

FAIL

Verdict and provenance first; raw prompt/response/reasoning below, collapsed.

✕FAILanswered "unknown" · model Nemotron 3 Super 120B

finish_reason: stop · tokens in/out: 147/516 · cost: $0.000244 · latency: 3699.3 ms

belieftemplatestop

verifier_detail: kind=belief;campaign=1

lineage: a88b7fd3

← prev trial · trial 48 of 265 · next trial →

Why did it fail? Nemotron 3 Ultra · live on Nebius Token Factory

Ultra reads the prompt, this answer, the verified correct answer and the difficulty settings, then explains the mistake. The verifier's own classification is shown next to it for comparison.

Prompt 454 chars · 147 tokens in
At 8:03, Nadia moved the large tablet into the cafeteria. At 8:05, Wren refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:04, Nadia reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:00, she brought the cracked tablet over to the cafeteria. At 8:02, Wren moved the large tablet into the wine cellar. At 8:01, Tamsin carried the cracked tablet to the west wing.

Where does Wren believe the cracked tablet is? Answer with only the location name (or 'unknown' if they have no belief).
Response 516 tokens out · finish: stop

unknown
Reasoning 2,214 chars
Model reasoning
We need to parse events and infer beliefs about where each person thinks objects are based on their actions. The question: "Where does Wren believe the cracked tablet is?" We need to see what Wren knows or believes given the timeline.

Events:

- At 8:00, she [Nadia] brought the cracked tablet over to the cafeteria.
- At 8:01, Tamsin carried the cracked tablet to the west wing.
- At 8:02, Wren moved the large tablet into the wine cellar.
- At 8:03, Nadia moved the large tablet into the cafeteria.
- At 8:04, Nadia reorganized some papers on the desk.
- At 8:05, Wren refilled a cup of coffee.

We need to consider knowledge propagation: People know about movements they perform themselves; maybe they also observe others? Usually in such puzzles, we assume agents only know about actions they performed directly, unless otherwise stated. So Wren's knowledge includes his own actions: moving the large tablet into the wine cellar at 8:02, and refilling coffee at 8:05. He did not interact with the cracked tablet himself. Did he witness any other agent moving it? Not indicated. So Wren has no direct observation of cracked tablet after its initial placement by Nadia at 8:00 (to cafeteria) then Tamsin moved it at 8:01 to west wing. If Wren didn't see those, he might still believe it's where he last knew it was? But he never knew about cracked tablet at all? Actually at 8:00 Nadia brought cracked tablet to cafeteria. Does Wren know that? Not unless he observed. No mention. So Wren may have no belief about cracked tablet (unknown). However perhaps we assume common knowledge that everyone sees actions? Typically these puzzles assume that all agents observe all actions? Not sure. Let's think: The puzzle likely tests tracking of object locations based on observed actions. Usually you assume each person knows the location of objects they have interacted with, and they update based on observing others' actions if they see them. Since not specified that they see each other's actions, we cannot assume they do. So Wren only knows about his own actions: moving large tablet to wine cellar, refilling coffee. He never interacted with cracked tablet, so he has no belief => unknown.

Thus answer: unknown.
Realized dims 5
dimvalue
context_length6.0
coreference3.0
distractors2.0
entity_state2.0
temporal0.7333333333333333
Latent params 5
paramvalue
chain_length2.0
coref_pressure0.0
distractor_events2.0
filler_events2.0
scramble1.0