Record 91ffd2c324614166af5e772684d67a58

We need to produce a sequence of tool calls leading to auth-api-0 being healthy.

Goal: service auth-api-0 (svc_0) must reach at least 'healthy'.

Current state: all services down, artifacts absent, flags off.

We have many duplicate flags with same names but different IDs? Let's parse:

Entity IDs list includes:
- Services: svc_0 (auth-api-0), svc_1 (gateway-1)
- Artifacts: art_0 (release-image), art_1 (db-migration)
- Flags: flag_0 (maintenance_window_open), flag_1 (secrets_synced), depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on), depth_flag_1 (backup_taken), depth_flag_2 (quota_raised), depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open), depth_flag_4 (secrets_synced), depth_flag_5 (feature_gate_on), depth_flag_6 (backup_taken)

So there are multiple flags representing similar concepts maybe duplicates due to naming confusion. We'll treat each as separate boolean variable.

Preconditions per tool refer to specific flags by their entity IDs? For example, set_flag_o0 sets flag_0 (maintenance_window_open). It requires precondition: flag_0 currently false.

set_depth_flag_o5 sets depth_flag_5 (feature_gate_on) requiring depth_flag_4 first.

set_depth_flag_o6 sets depth_flag_6 (backup_taken) requiring depth_flag_5 first.

set_dep_th_flag_0 sets depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on) requiring flag_0 first.

set_dep_th_flag_1 sets depth_flag_1 (backup_taken) requiring depth_flag_0 first.

set_dep_th_flag_2 sets depth_flag_2 (quota_raised) requiring depth_flag_1 first.

set_depth_flag_o3 sets depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open) requiring depth_flag_2 first.

set_dep_th_flag_4 sets depth_flag_4 (secrets_synced) requiring depth_flag_3 first.

Thus we have two chains: one chain using depth_flag_x series starting from flag_0 -> depth_flag_0 -> depth_flag_1 -> depth_flag_2 -> depth_flag_3 -> depth_flag_4 -> depth_flag_5 -> depth_flag_6.

But note some duplication: depth_flag_0 also appears via set_depth_flag_o5? Actually set_depth_flag_o5 sets depth_flag_5 requiring depth_flag_4. So they share same depth_flag variables.

Let's map:

flag_0 = maintenance_window_open
flag_1 = secrets_synced

depth_flag_0 = feature_gate_on
depth_flag_1 = backup_taken
depth_flag_2 = quota_raised
depth_flag_3 = maintenance_window_open   // duplicate?
depth_flag_4 = secrets_synced          // duplicate?
depth_flag_5 = feature_gate_on         // duplicate?
depth_flag_6 = backup_taken            // duplicate?

Seems like they made two parallel chains: one shallow (flag_0/flag_1) then deep chain replicates them again.

The health-check tool (adva-nce_3) requires depth_flag_6 flag set AND art_0 artifact published.

Thus to get svc_0 healthy, we need to:

- Provision svc_0 (down->provisioned)
- Configure svc_0 (provisioned->configured)
- Deploy svc_0 (configured->deployed)
- Health-check svc_0 (deployed->healthy) which needs depth_flag_6 true and art_0 published.

Additionally we might need to ensure other prerequisites? Not required.

Thus steps:

1. Provision svc_0: adva_nce_0 with service svc_0.
2. Configure svc_0: adva_nce_1 with service svc_0.
3. Deploy svc_0: adva_nce_2 with service svc_0.
4. Build artifact art_0: build-_art_0 (note tool id: build-_art_0) with artifact art_0.
5. Publish artifact art_0: publish_art_o0 with artifact art_0.
6. Set flags to eventually get depth_flag_6 true.

Now we need to set depth_flag_6 true. According to tool set_depth_flag_o6 sets depth_flag_6 true, precondition: depth_flag_6 currently false, requires depth_flag_4 flag first.

Thus before setting depth_flag_6, we need depth_flag_4 true.

Depth_flag_4 can be set via set_dep_th_flag_4 (sets depth_flag_4 true) requiring depth_flag_3 first.

Depth_flag_3 via set_depth_flag_o3 (sets depth_flag_3 true) requiring depth_flag_2 first.

Depth_flag_2 via set_dep_th_flag_2 (sets depth_flag_2 true) requiring depth_flag_1 first.

Depth_flag_1 via set_dep_th_flag_1 (sets depth_flag_1 true) requiring depth_flag_0 first.

Depth_flag_0 via set_dep_th_flag_0 (sets depth_flag_0 true) requiring flag_0 first.

Flag_0 via set_flag_o0 (sets flag_0 true) precondition flag_0 false.

Alternatively could start from flag_1? No, chain uses flag_0 only.

Thus we need to set flag_0 then depth_flag_0 etc up to depth_flag_6.

Also note there is another chain using flag_1? There's set_depth_flag_o5 requiring depth_flag_4 (same). And set_depth_flag_o6 requiring depth_flag_5. But we already have path via depth_flag_0..6.

Thus we need following flag-setting steps in order:

- set_flag_o0 (flag_0)
- set_dep_th_flag_0 (depth_flag_0) [requires flag_0]
- set_dep_th_flag_1 (depth_flag_1) [requires depth_flag_0]
- set_dep_th_flag_2 (depth_flag_2) [requires depth_flag_1]
- set_depth_flag_o3 (depth_flag_3) [requires depth_flag_2]
- set_dep_th_flag_4 (depth_flag_4) [requires depth_flag_3]
- set_depth_flag_o5 (depth_flag_5) [requires depth_flag_4]
- set_depth_flag_o6 (depth_flag_6) [requires depth_flag_5]

Check each tool exists:

- set_flag_o0: yes.
- set_dep_th_flag_0: yes (id: set_dep_th_flag_0)
- set_dep_th_flag_1: yes (id: set_dep_th_flag_1)
- set_dep_th_flag_2: yes (id: set_dep_th_flag_2)
- set_depth_flag_o3: yes (id: set_depth_flag_o3)
- set_dep_th_flag_4: yes (id: set_dep_th_flag_4)
- set_depth_flag_o5: yes (id: set_depth_flag_o5)
- set_depth_flag_o6: yes (id: set_depth_flag_o6)

All good.

Now after depth_flag_6 true and art_0 published, we can health-check svc_0: adva-nce_3 (note hyphen?) Tool id: adva-nce_3 (includes hyphen). It requires service param.

Thus final step: adva-nce_3 with service svc_0.

Now check if any other constraints: health-check also requires depth_flag_6 flag set (we will have) and art_0 artifact published (we will have). Good.

Now verify that we haven't missed any needed flags like maintenance_window_open or secrets_synced? Not required for health-check directly. However some tools may have preconditions requiring those flags? Not in our path.

Thus total steps:

1. adva_nce_0 (provision svc_0)
2. adva_nce_1 (configure svc_0)
3. adva_nce_2 (deploy svc_0)
4. build-_art_0 (build artifact)
5. publish_art_o0 (publish artifact)
6. set_flag_o0 (flag_0)
7. set_dep_th_flag_0 (depth_flag_0)
8. set_dep_th_flag_1 (depth_flag_1)
9. set_dep_th_flag_2 (depth_flag_2)
10. set_depth_flag_o3 (depth_flag_3)
11. set_dep_th_flag_4 (depth_flag_4)
12. set_depth_flag_o5 (depth_flag_5)
13. set_depth_flag_o6 (depth_flag_6)
14. adva-nce_3 (health-check svc_0)

That's 14 tool calls, within limit 28.

Need to output JSON array with objects {"tool": "<tool id>", "args": {"service": "...", "artifact": "...", "flag": "...", ...}}.

Make sure to use correct entity IDs: service: svc_0 or svc_1; artifact: art_0 or art_1; flag: flag_0 etc.

Now double-check each tool's parameter name: they all have param name matching the type: e.g., provision takes "service": service. configure takes "service": service. deploy takes "service": service. health-check takes "service": service. build_artifact takes "artifact": artifact. publish_artifact takes "artifact": artifact. set_flag takes "flag": flag.

Thus for each set_flag tool we need to pass flag: <entity id>. Eg set_flag_o0: flag: flag_0.

Similarly set_dep_th_flag_0: flag: depth_flag_0.

Set_dep_th_flag_1: flag: depth_flag_1.

Set_dep_th_flag_2: flag: depth_flag_2.

Set_depth_flag_o3: flag: depth_flag_3.

Set_dep_th_flag_4: flag: depth_flag_4.

Set_depth_flag_o5: flag: depth_flag_5.

Set_depth_flag_o6: flag: depth_flag_6.

Now confirm that each tool's precondition about requiring another flag first is satisfied by ordering.

- set_flag_o0: requires flag_0 false initially true? Initially flag_0 off (false). OK.

- set_dep_th_flag_0: requires flag_0 first. After step 6 flag_0 true. OK.

- set_dep_th_flag_1: requires depth_flag_0 first. After step 7 depth_flag_0 true. OK.

- set_dep_th_flag_2: requires depth_flag_1 first. After step 8 depth_flag_1 true. OK.

- set_depth_flag_o3: requires depth_flag_2 first. After step 9 depth_flag_2 true. OK.

- set_dep_th_flag_4: requires depth_flag_3 first. After step 10 depth_flag_3 true. OK.

- set_depth_flag_o5: requires depth_flag_4 first. After step 11 depth_flag_4 true. OK.

- set_depth_flag_o6: requires depth_flag_5 first. After step 12 depth_flag_5 true. OK.

Now health-check: requires depth_flag_6 true (step13) and art_0 published (step5). Yes.

Now ensure that we didn't need to also set any other flags like maintenance_window_open (flag_0) already set; secrets_synced (flag_1) not needed.

Now check that we didn't inadvertently violate any precondition like "requires the depth_flag_4 flag first" for set_depth_flag_o5 - we have depth_flag_4 true before step12.

All good.

Now produce JSON array.

Order matters.

Let's list:

[
 {"tool":"adva_nce_0","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
 {"tool":"adva_nce_1","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
 {"tool":"adva_nce_2","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
 {"tool":"build-_art_0","args":{"artifact":"art_0"}},
 {"tool":"publish_art_o0","args":{"artifact":"art_0"}},
 {"tool":"set_flag_o0","args":{"flag":"flag_0"}},
 {"tool":"set_dep_th_flag_0","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_0"}},
 {"tool":"set_dep_th_flag_1","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_1"}},
 {"tool":"set_dep_th_flag_2","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_2"}},
 {"tool":"set_depth_flag_o3","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_3"}},
 {"tool":"set_dep_th_flag_4","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_4"}},
 {"tool":"set_depth_flag_o5","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_5"}},
 {"tool":"set_depth_flag_o6","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_6"}},
 {"tool":"adva-nce_3","args":{"service":"svc_0"}}
]

Check spelling of tool IDs exactly as given:

- adva_nce_0 (yes)
- adva_nce_1 (yes)
- adva_nce_2 (yes)
- build-_art_0 (note includes hyphen and underscore: "build-_art_0")
- publish_art_o0 (note: "publish_art_o0")
- set_flag_o0
- set_dep_th_flag_0
- set_dep_th_flag_1
- set_dep_th_flag_2
- set_depth_flag_o3
- set_dep_th_flag_4
- set_depth_flag_o5
- set_depth_flag_o6
- adva-nce_3 (note hyphen after adva): "adva-nce_3"

Make sure to use exactly those strings.

Now output JSON array only.