Record 8ec20e038da14be4851af217792de479
FAILVerdict and provenance first; raw prompt/response/reasoning below, collapsed.
✕FAILanswered "cafeteria"
Why did it fail?
Prompt
At 8:00, Tamsin brought the cracked tablet over to the loading dock. At 8:00, Nolan noticed this from across the room. At 8:01, she took the cracked tablet and placed it in the cafeteria. At 8:02, she moved the narrow tablet into the library. At 8:03, Elena carried the narrow tablet to the security office. At 8:04, Tamsin reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:05, she refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:06, Nolan checked their email. Where does Nolan believe the cracked tablet is? Answer with only the location name (or 'unknown' if they have no belief).
Response
cafeteria
Reasoning
Model reasoning
We need to parse the scenario. At 8:00, Tamsin brought the cracked tablet over to the loading dock. At 8:00, Nolan noticed this from across the room. At 8:01, she took the cracked tablet and placed it in the cafeteria. At 8:02, she moved the narrow tablet into the library. At 8:03, Elena carried the narrow tablet to the security office. At 8:04, Tamsin reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:05, she refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:06, Nolan checked their email. Question: Where does Nolan believe the cracked tablet is? Answer with only the location name (or 'unknown' if they have no belief). We need to infer Nolan's belief about where the cracked tablet is, based on observations up to 8:06. He observed at 8:00 that Tamsin brought the cracked tablet to the loading dock. Then at 8:01 she took the cracked tablet and placed it in the cafeteria. So after 8:01, the cracked tablet is in the cafeteria. Did Nolan see that? He noticed at 8:00 from across the room. At 8:01, she took the cracked tablet and placed it in the cafeteria. Did Nolan see that? It says "At 8:01, she took the cracked tablet and placed it in the cafeteria." It doesn't say Nolan saw it, but likely he observed the action? The phrasing: "At 8:00, Tamsin brought the cracked tablet over to the loading dock. At 8:00, Nolan noticed this from across the room." So at 8:00, Nolan noticed the cracked tablet being brought to loading dock. Then at 8:01, she took the cracked tablet and placed it in the cafeteria. It doesn't explicitly say Nolan saw that, but likely he also saw it? The timeline: At 8:01, she took the cracked tablet and placed it in the cafeteria. Probably Nolan observed that as well? Not explicitly. At 8:02, she moved the narrow tablet into the library. At 8:03, Elena carried the narrow tablet to the security office. At 8:04, Tamsin reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:05, she refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:06, Nolan checked their email. We need to infer where Nolan believes the cracked tablet is. He observed at 8:00 that Tamsin brought it to loading dock. Then at 8:01 she took it and placed it in the cafeteria. Did he see that? Possibly yes, because it's part of the narrative. The question likely expects that Nolan believes the cracked tablet is in the cafeteria, because that's the last location he observed it being placed. He might not be aware of later movements of other tablets. The cracked tablet is distinct from the narrow tablet. The narrow tablet is moved to library, then to security office. But the cracked tablet is only mentioned being placed in cafeteria at 8:01. No further movement of cracked tablet is described. So Nolan's belief: it's in the cafeteria. Thus answer: cafeteria. Provide only location name.
Realized dims
| dim | value |
|---|---|
| context_length | 7.0 |
| coreference | 1.0 |
| distractors | 2.0 |
| entity_state | 2.0 |
| foil_divergence | 3.0 |
| temporal | 0.0 |
| witness_gap | 1.0 |
Latent params
| param | value |
|---|---|
| chain_length | 2.0 |
| coref_pressure | 0.0 |
| distractor_events | 2.0 |
| filler_events | 2.0 |
| scramble | 0.0 |
| witness_cutoff | 0.225 |