Data to …… trials

Record 8e353939f56c4a31907e53492389abe0

PASS

Verdict and provenance first; raw prompt/response/reasoning below, collapsed.

✓PASSanswered "north stairwell" · model gpt-oss-120b

finish_reason: stop · tokens in/out: 203/657 · cost: $0.000425 · latency: 4566.1 ms

belieftemplatestop

verifier_detail: kind=belief;campaign=1

lineage: 8e353939

← prev trial · trial 30 of 160 · next trial →

Prompt 488 chars · 203 tokens in
At 8:01, Oscar moved the red tablet into the boiler room. At 8:02, Nadia moved the shiny folder into the conference room. At 8:03, she carried the shiny folder to the boiler room. At 8:04, Felix reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:00, she brought the red tablet over to the north stairwell. At 8:06, she checked their email. At 8:05, she refilled a cup of coffee.

Where does Nadia believe the red tablet is? Answer with only the location name (or 'unknown' if they have no belief).
Response 657 tokens out · finish: stop
north stairwell
Reasoning 2,406 chars
Model reasoning
We need to parse the timeline and infer beliefs. Entities: Oscar, Nadia, Felix, "she" (who? ambiguous). The statements:

- At 8:01, Oscar moved the red tablet into the boiler room.
- At 8:02, Nadia moved the shiny folder into the conference room.
- At 8:03, she (who?) carried the shiny folder to the boiler room.
- At 8:04, Felix reorganized some papers on the desk.
- At 8:00, she brought the red tablet over to the north stairwell.
- At 8:06, she checked their email.
- At 8:05, she refilled a cup of coffee.

We need to determine Nadia's belief about the location of the red tablet. We need to consider what Nadia knows. She observed events? She might have observed some events but not others. The timeline is out of order: 8:00 event is after 8:01? Actually 8:00 is earlier than 8:01. The list is not chronological. Let's reorder chronologically:

8:00: she brought the red tablet over to the north stairwell.
8:01: Oscar moved the red tablet into the boiler room.
8:02: Nadia moved the shiny folder into the conference room.
8:03: she carried the shiny folder to the boiler room.
8:04: Felix reorganized some papers on the desk.
8:05: she refilled a cup of coffee.
8:06: she checked their email.

Now, who is "she"? Could be Nadia? Or could be someone else? The pronoun "she" appears multiple times: at 8:03, 8:00, 8:05, 8:06. The only female named is Nadia. Felix is male? Not sure. Oscar is male. So "she" likely refers to Nadia. So Nadia performed actions at 8:00, 8:03, 8:05, 8:06. At 8:00, Nadia brought the red tablet to north stairwell. At 8:01, Oscar moved the red tablet to boiler room (Nadia may not have observed). At 8:02, Nadia moved shiny folder to conference room. At 8:03, Nadia carried shiny folder to boiler room. At 8:04, Felix reorganized papers (irrelevant). At 8:05, Nadia refilled coffee. At 8:06, Nadia checked email.

Thus Nadia's belief about red tablet location depends on what she knows. She moved the red tablet at 8:00 to north stairwell. She may not know Oscar moved it at 8:01 (unless she observed). The timeline suggests she didn't see Oscar moving it. So her belief likely remains that the red tablet is at north stairwell. However, after 8:01, the tablet is actually in boiler room. But Nadia's belief is still north stairwell unless she later learns. No later events indicate she learns about it. So answer: north stairwell.

Thus location name: "north stairwell".
Realized dims 6
dimvalue
context_length7.0
coreference1.0
distractors2.0
entity_state2.0
temporal0.23809523809523808
witness_gap1.0
Latent params 6
paramvalue
chain_length2.0
coref_pressure0.0
distractor_events2.0
filler_events2.0
scramble0.25
witness_cutoff0.0