Data to …… trials

Record 843b826a0582402a8f36978f87738ac0

FAIL

Verdict and provenance first; raw prompt/response/reasoning below, collapsed.

✕FAILanswered "ANSWER: 47" · model Gemma 3 27B

finish_reason: stop · tokens in/out: 260/737 · cost: $0.000247 · latency: 8828.5 ms

code_tracetemplatestop

verifier_detail: kind=code_trace;campaign=1;query=final_value;detail=foil:truncating_modulo;n_stmts=28;trace_len=33;traps=aliasing_on=1;late_binding_on=1;shadowing_on=0;inclusive_range_trap_on=1;negative_modulo_on=1;mutable_default_on=1;confusability=0

trap kind(s) this world was seeded for: aliasing_on=1

lineage: 843b826a

← prev trial · trial 130 of 133 · next trial →

Why did it fail? Nemotron 3 Ultra · live on Nebius Token Factory

Ultra reads the prompt, this answer, the verified correct answer and the difficulty settings, then explains the mistake. The verifier's own classification is shown next to it for comparison.

Prompt 734 chars · 260 tokens in
Here is a short Python program.

```python
bonus = 8
score = 1
spare = 9
bonus += spare
if score > score:
    score = bonus * 2
    score = bonus if bonus < score else score + 1
else:
    bonus += score * 2
marks = [5, 6, 0]
bins = marks
bins.append(15)
bonus += len(marks)
amount = 2

def bump(w):
    return w + amount

amount += 4
bonus += bump(2)
for j in range(6):
    bonus += j
quota = bonus - 51
extra = quota % 3
bonus += extra

def shift_by(val, bag=[]):
    bag.append(val)
    return len(bag)

count = shift_by(7)
total = shift_by(5)
bonus += count + total
```

After this program runs, what is the value of `bonus`? Work through it carefully, then give the final answer on its own last line as `ANSWER: <python literal>`.
Response 737 tokens out · finish: stop
Let's trace the execution of the Python code step by step to determine the final value of `bonus`.

1. `bonus = 8`
2. `score = 1`
3. `spare = 9`
4. `bonus += spare`  => `bonus = 8 + 9 = 17`
5. `if score > score:` (1 > 1 is false)
6. `else:`
7. `bonus += score * 2` => `bonus = 17 + 1 * 2 = 17 + 2 = 19`
8. `marks = [5, 6, 0]`
9. `bins = marks` (bins and marks now point to the same list)
10. `bins.append(15)` => `marks` is also modified: `marks = [5, 6, 0, 15]`
11. `bonus += len(marks)` => `bonus = 19 + 4 = 23`
12. `amount = 2`
13. `def bump(w): ...` (function definition, doesn't affect `bonus` yet)
14. `amount += 4` => `amount = 2 + 4 = 6`
15. `bonus += bump(2)` => `bonus += 2 + 6 = 8` => `bonus = 23 + 8 = 31`
16. `for j in range(6):`
   - `j = 0`: `bonus += j` => `bonus = 31 + 0 = 31`
   - `j = 1`: `bonus += j` => `bonus = 31 + 1 = 32`
   - `j = 2`: `bonus += j` => `bonus = 32 + 2 = 34`
   - `j = 3`: `bonus += j` => `bonus = 34 + 3 = 37`
   - `j = 4`: `bonus += j` => `bonus = 37 + 4 = 41`
   - `j = 5`: `bonus += j` => `bonus = 41 + 5 = 46`
17. `quota = bonus - 51` => `quota = 46 - 51 = -5`
18. `extra = quota % 3` => `extra = -5 % 3 = -2`
19. `bonus += extra` => `bonus = 46 + (-2) = 44`
20. `def shift_by(val, bag=[]): ...` (function definition)
21. `count = shift_by(7)` => `bag` is initialized as `[]`, `bag.append(7)`, `len(bag)` is 1, `count = 1`
22. `total = shift_by(5)` => `bag` is still `[7]`, `bag.append(5)`, `len(bag)` is 2, `total = 2`
23. `bonus += count + total` => `bonus = 44 + 1 + 2 = 47`

ANSWER: 47
Reasoning not captured

(no reasoning captured)

Realized dims 17
dimvalue
aliasing_on1.0
answer_size2.0
distractor_fraction0.0
identifier_confusability0.0
inclusive_range_trap_on1.0
late_binding_on1.0
max_nesting1.0
mutable_default_on1.0
n_closures1.0
n_foil_matches1.0
n_live_aliases1.0
n_statements28.0
n_variables10.0
negative_modulo_on1.0
shadowing_on0.0
trace_length33.0
traps_on5.0
Latent params 11
paramvalue
aliasing_on1.0
distractor_fraction0.0
identifier_confusability0.0
inclusive_range_trap_on1.0
late_binding_on1.0
max_nesting1.0
mutable_default_on1.0
n_statements18.0
n_variables3.0
negative_modulo_on1.0
shadowing_on0.0