Record 7ecb774c9e7d4222af6ce343142e4112

We need to produce a JSON array of tool calls that will achieve the goal: service 'ingest-0' must reach at least the 'healthy' state. Use exact entity IDs: services svc_0 (ingest-0), svc_1 (ledger-1). Artifacts art_0 (release-image), art_1 (db-migration). Flags: flag_0 (maintenance_window_open), flag_1 (secrets_synced), depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on), depth_flag_1 (backup_taken), depth_flag_2 (quota_raised), depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open), depth_flag_4 (secrets_synced). Actually depth_flag_3 is maintenance_window_open again? It seems duplicate but okay.

We have current state: ingest-0 is down (not provisioned). ledger-1 is down (not provisioned). release-image artifact does not exist yet. db-migration artifact does not exist yet. maintenance_window_open flag is off. secrets_synced flag is off. feature_gate_on flag is off. backup_taken flag is off. quota_raised flag is off. maintenance_window_open flag is off. secrets_synced flag is off. (duplicate statements). So basically all flags are off, artifacts absent, services down.

Goal: ingest-0 must reach at least 'healthy' state. That means we need to provision it, configure, deploy, health-check. Also need preconditions: health-check requires service deployed and depth_flag_4 set and artifact_0 published. Also depth_flag_4 requires depth_flag_3 set. depth_flag_3 requires depth_flag_2 set. depth_flag_2 requires depth_flag_1 set. depth_flag_1 requires depth_flag_0 set. depth_flag_0 requires flag_0 first? Actually set_depth_flag_0 precondition: it must currently be false. Requires the flag_0 flag first. Wait: The description: "id: set_depth_flag_0 | name: set_flag | params: flag: flag | Precondition: it must currently be false. Requires the flag_0 flag first." That seems contradictory: "Requires the flag_0 flag first." Probably means you must have set flag_0 previously? Actually flag_0 is a separate flag (maintenance_window_open). So to set depth_flag_0, you need flag_0 to be set? Or you need to have set flag_0? The wording: "Requires the flag_0 flag first." Means you must have set flag_0 earlier. So sequence: set_flag_0 (set maintenance_window_open to true) then you can set_depth_flag_0 (set feature_gate_on to true). Then you can set_depth_flag_1 (set backup_taken) requiring depth_flag_0 first. Then set_depth_flag_2 requiring depth_flag_1, then set_depth_flag_3 requiring depth_flag_2, then set_depth_flag_4 requiring depth_flag_3. Also set_depth_flag_4 is needed for health-check.

Also need to publish artifact_0 after building it. Build_art_0 builds artifact from absent to built. Then publish_art_0 moves built to published. Health-check requires artifact published.

Also need to provision service ingest-0 (svc_0) from down to provisioned. That's advance_0 tool.

Then configure service (advance_1) from provisioned to configured.

Then deploy service (advance_2) from configured to deployed.

Then health-check (advance_3) from deployed to healthy, requiring depth_flag_4 and artifact_0 published.

Thus we need to set up flags in order: set_flag_0 (maintenance_window_open) -> set_depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on) -> set_depth_flag_1 (backup_taken) -> set_depth_flag_2 (quota_raised) -> set_depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open again?) Actually depth_flag_3 is maintenance_window_open again but maybe it's a different flag? It is named depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open). But we already have flag_0 (maintenance_window_open). So depth_flag_3 is a different flag but also named maintenance_window_open? Might be a depth flag for that same concept but at deeper level. Anyway we need to set depth_flag_3 after depth_flag_2. Then set_depth_flag_4 (secrets_synced) after depth_flag_3.

Also need to build artifact_0 (release-image) and publish it.

Also need to provision service svc_0 (ingest-0). Also maybe we need to provision ledger-1? Not required for goal but maybe needed for other flags? Not needed.

But we also need to set flags for secrets_synced? Actually depth_flag_4 is secrets_synced, which is required for health-check. So we need to set depth_flag_4 after depth_flag_3. That's fine.

We also need to set flag_1 (secrets_synced) maybe not needed? Actually flag_1 is secrets_synced at top-level? The current state says secrets_synced flag is off. But we have depth_flag_4 also secrets_synced? Might be separate. But we only need depth_flag_4 for health-check. So we can set depth_flag_4 directly after depth_flag_3.

But we must respect preconditions: set_depth_flag_1 requires depth_flag_0 first. set_depth_flag_2 requires depth_flag_1 first. set_depth_flag_3 requires depth_flag_2 first. set_depth_flag_4 requires depth_flag_3 first.

Also set_depth_flag_0 requires flag_0 first. So we need to set flag_0 (maintenance_window_open) first.

Thus sequence of flag settings:

1. set_flag_0 (flag: maintenance_window_open) -> sets flag_0 to true.

2. set_depth_flag_0 (flag: feature_gate_on) -> sets depth_flag_0 to true. Precondition: flag_0 is true (set previously). Also must be currently false (it is false initially). Good.

3. set_depth_flag_1 (flag: backup_taken) -> sets depth_flag_1 to true. Precondition: depth_flag_0 is true (set previously) and currently false.

4. set_depth_flag_2 (flag: quota_raised) -> sets depth_flag_2 to true. Precondition: depth_flag_1 true.

5. set_depth_flag_3 (flag: maintenance_window_open) -> sets depth_flag_3 to true. Precondition: depth_flag_2 true.

6. set_depth_flag_4 (flag: secrets_synced) -> sets depth_flag_4 to true. Precondition: depth_flag_3 true.

Now we also need to build artifact_0 (release-image). It is currently absent. So we can call build_art_0 with artifact: art_0.

Then publish_art_0 with artifact: art_0 (requires built). So after build, we can publish.

Now we need to provision service svc_0 (ingest-0). It's down. So call advance_0 with service: svc_0.

Then configure service: advance_1 with service: svc_0.

Then deploy service: advance_2 with service: svc_0.

Then health-check: advance_3 with service: svc_0. This requires depth_flag_4 set (we will have set it earlier) and artifact_0 published (we will have published). So order: after publishing artifact, we can health-check.

Thus overall plan steps:

1. set_flag_0 (flag: maintenance_window_open) -> flag_0 true.

2. set_depth_flag_0 (flag: feature_gate_on) -> depth_flag_0 true.

3. set_depth_flag_1 (flag: backup_taken) -> depth_flag_1 true.

4. set_depth_flag_2 (flag: quota_raised) -> depth_flag_2 true.

5. set_depth_flag_3 (flag: maintenance_window_open) -> depth_flag_3 true.

6. set_depth_flag_4 (flag: secrets_synced) -> depth_flag_4 true.

7. build_art_0 (artifact: art_0) -> artifact built.

8. publish_art_0 (artifact: art_0) -> artifact published.

9. advance_0 (service: svc_0) -> provisioned.

10. advance_1 (service: svc_0) -> configured.

11. advance_2 (service: svc_0) -> deployed.

12. advance_3 (service: svc_0) -> healthy.

We must ensure each tool call's precondition holds at that point.

Let's verify:

- set_flag_0 precondition: must be currently false. Initially it's off, so false. Good.

- set_depth_flag_0 precondition: must be currently false (depth_flag_0 is false initially) and requires flag_0 flag first. We have set flag_0 true, so precondition satisfied.

- set_depth_flag_1 precondition: must be currently false (depth_flag_1 false) and requires depth_flag_0 first. We have set depth_flag_0 true, so ok.

- set_depth_flag_2 precondition: must be currently false (depth_flag_2 false) and requires depth_flag_1 first. We have set depth_flag_1 true, ok.

- set_depth_flag_3 precondition: must be currently false (depth_flag_3 false) and requires depth_flag_2 first. We have set depth_flag_2 true, ok.

- set_depth_flag_4 precondition: must be currently false (depth_flag_4 false) and requires depth_flag_3 first. We have set depth_flag_3 true, ok.

- build_art_0 precondition: artifact must be absent. It is absent initially, ok.

- publish_art_0 precondition: artifact must be built. After build, it's built, ok.

- advance_0 precondition: service must be down. svc_0 is down, ok.

- advance_1 precondition: service must be provisioned. After advance_0, it becomes provisioned, ok.

- advance_2 precondition: service must be configured. After advance_1, it becomes configured, ok.

- advance_3 precondition: service must be deployed and depth_flag_4 set and artifact_0 published. We will have set depth_flag_4 true earlier, and published artifact, and after deploy it will be deployed, so ok.

Thus sequence of 12 calls is within 24 limit.

Now we need to output JSON array of objects with "tool": "<tool id>", "args": {...}. Use exact tool IDs as given.

Tool IDs:

- set_depth_flag_1 -> id: set_depth_flag_1

- set_depth_flag_0 -> id: set_depth_flag_0

- build_art_0 -> id: build_art_0

- set_depth_flag_2 -> id: set_depth_flag_2

- advance_1 -> id: advance_1

- set_depth_flag_3 -> id: set_depth_flag_3

- advance_2 -> id: advance_2

- set_flag_0 -> id: set_flag_0

- set_depth_flag_4 -> id: set_depth_flag_4

- advance_0 -> id: advance_0

- publish_art_0 -> id: publish_art_0

- advance_3 -> id: advance_3

But we need to order them as per plan. The plan order we listed includes set_flag_0 first, then set_depth_flag_0, then set_depth_flag_1, then set_depth_flag_2, then set_depth_flag_3, then set_depth_flag_4, then build_art_0, then publish_art_0, then advance_0, then advance_1, then advance_2, then advance_3.

Thus the JSON array should have 12 objects in that order.

Make sure param names match tool definitions.

Tool definitions:

- set_flag_0: name: set_flag | params: flag: flag

Thus args: {"flag": "maintenance_window_open"}? Actually flag_0 corresponds to maintenance_window_open flag. The parameter is "flag". So we need to pass flag: "maintenance_window_open"? The entity ID? The flag name is "maintenance_window_open". The tool expects param "flag". So we pass "flag": "maintenance_window_open". Similarly for set_depth_flag_0: param "flag": "feature_gate_on". set_depth_flag_1: param "flag": "backup_taken". set_depth_flag_2: param "flag": "quota_raised". set_depth_flag_3: param "flag": "maintenance_window_open". set_depth_flag_4: param "flag": "secrets_synced". set_flag_0 is same as set_depth_flag_0? Actually set_flag_0 is a separate tool that sets flag_0 (maintenance_window_open). Its param is also "flag". So we use same param name.

Thus for each flag setting, args: {"flag": "<flag_name>"}.

For build_art_0: param "artifact": "art_0". publish_art_0: param "artifact": "art_0". advance_0: param "service": "svc_0". advance_1: param "service": "svc_0". advance_2: param "service": "svc_0". advance_3: param "service": "svc_0". Also health-check requires depth_flag_4 and artifact published, but those are preconditions, not parameters.

Thus JSON array:

[
  {"tool":"set_flag_0","args":{"flag":"maintenance_window_open"}},
  {"tool":"set_depth_flag_0","args":{"flag":"feature_gate_on"}},
  {"tool":"set_depth_flag_1","args":{"flag":"backup_taken"}},
  {"tool":"set_depth_flag_2","args":{"flag":"quota_raised"}},
  {"tool":"set_depth_flag_3","args":{"flag":"maintenance_window_open"}},
  {"tool":"set_depth_flag_4","args":{"flag":"secrets_synced"}},
  {"tool":"build_art_0","args":{"artifact":"art_0"}},
  {"tool":"publish_art_0","args":{"artifact":"art_0"}},
  {"tool":"advance_0","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
  {"tool":"advance_1","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
  {"tool":"advance_2","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
  {"tool":"advance_3","args":{"service":"svc_0"}}
]

Check that tool IDs are exactly as given: set_flag_0, set_depth_flag_0, set_depth_flag_1, set_depth_flag_2, set_depth_flag_3, set_depth_flag_4, build_art_0, publish_art_0, advance_0, advance_1, advance_2, advance_3. Yes.

Now ensure no extra prose, just JSON array. No markdown fences. Provide exactly the array.

Thus final answer.