Data to …… trials

Record 5b4034039c5942ad8b6963e3bdbd4803

FAIL

Verdict and provenance first; raw prompt/response/reasoning below, collapsed.

✕FAILanswered "unknown" · model Nemotron 3 Super 120B

finish_reason: stop · tokens in/out: 184/589 · cost: $0.000280 · latency: 4114.4 ms

belieftemplatestop

verifier_detail: kind=belief;campaign=1

lineage: 5b403403

← prev trial · trial 109 of 265 · next trial →

Why did it fail? Nemotron 3 Ultra · live on Nebius Token Factory

Ultra reads the prompt, this answer, the verified correct answer and the difficulty settings, then explains the mistake. The verifier's own classification is shown next to it for comparison.

Prompt 585 chars · 184 tokens in
At 8:00, Bruno brought the bright tablet over to the gym. At 8:01, Tamsin moved the bright tablet into the supply closet. At 8:02, he brought the shiny basket over to the east wing. At 8:03, Gideon brought the shiny basket over to the supply closet. At 8:04, he reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:05, Greta refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:06, Rafi checked their email. At 8:07, Bruno checked their email. At 8:08, Gideon reorganized some papers on the desk.

Where does Greta believe the bright tablet is? Answer with only the location name (or 'unknown' if they have no belief).
Response 589 tokens out · finish: stop

unknown
Reasoning 2,414 chars
Model reasoning
We need to determine what Greta believes about the location of the bright tablet based on events and knowledge. The scenario includes multiple agents moving objects; we must infer each agent's beliefs given observations. Usually these puzzles assume that agents know only what they observed directly or were told? Not specified. Typically in such "belief" questions, we assume each person knows the locations of objects they have interacted with or observed being moved, unless otherwise stated. We need to track who saw what.

Events:

- 8:00: Bruno brought the bright tablet over to the gym.
So Bruno moves bright tablet to gym. He presumably knows it's now in gym after moving.

- 8:01: Tamsin moved the bright tablet into the supply closet.
Tamsin moves bright tablet from wherever it was (gym) to supply closet. She knows it's now in supply closet.

- 8:02: he brought the shiny basket over to the east wing.
Who is "he"? Likely Bruno? Actually earlier Bruno used male pronoun? Bruno is likely male. So at 8:02, Bruno brings shiny basket to east wing.

- 8:03: Gideon brought the shiny basket over to the supply closet.
Gideon moves shiny basket from east wing to supply closet.

- 8:04: he reorganized some papers on the desk.
Again "he": could be Bruno? Or maybe Gideon? Need context: After Gideon moved basket, then "he reorganized some papers". Could be Bruno again? But ambiguous. However later at 8:07 Bruno checked email, so Bruno still active. At 8:08 Gideon reorganized some papers on the desk. Wait there are two reorganizations: at 8:04 and 8:08. At 8:04 "he reorganized some papers on the desk." At 8:08 "Gideon reorganized some papers on the desk." So 8:04 likely Bruno (since Gideon's action is at 8:08). So 8:04 Bruno reorganized papers.

- 8:05: Greta refilled a cup of coffee.

- 8:06: Rafi checked their email.

- 8:07: Bruno checked their email.

- 8:08: Gideon reorganized some papers on the desk.

Thus Greta only acted at 8:05 refilling coffee. She didn't interact with bright tablet. Did she observe any movements? Not mentioned. So Greta has no direct observation of bright tablet location. Does she have any indirect knowledge? Possibly she heard or saw others? Not indicated. So we assume she has no belief (unknown). Unless we assume common knowledge that everyone knows the location changes as they happen? Usually not; only those who performed actions know.

Thus answer: unknown.
Realized dims 5
dimvalue
context_length9.0
coreference4.0
distractors2.0
entity_state2.0
temporal0.0
Latent params 5
paramvalue
chain_length2.0
coref_pressure3.0
distractor_events2.0
filler_events2.0
scramble0.0