Record 532425b4dc254bb3b08d8d32aa0a7d16

We need to produce a sequence of tool calls leading to webhooks-0 healthy.

Goal: service 'webhooks-0' must reach at least the 'healthy' state.

Current state: webhooks-0 is down (not yet provisioned). So we need to go through states: down -> provisioned -> configured -> deployed -> healthy.

Provision uses advance_0 with service param = svc_0? Actually entity IDs: Services: svc_0 (webhooks-0), svc_1 (cache-1). Tools have parameter "service: service". We'll pass appropriate service ID.

Thus steps:

1. advance_0 (provision) on svc_0 => moves from down to provisioned.

Precondition: service must be down. Yes.

Now after step1, webhooks-0 is provisioned.

2. advance_1 (configure) on svc_0 => requires service currently provisioned. Good.

After step2, webhooks-0 configured.

3. advance_2 (deploy) on svc_0 => requires service currently configured. After step2 yes.

After step3, webhooks-0 deployed.

But before health-check we need certain flags and artifacts per advance_3 (health-check): requires depth_flag_4 flag set AND art_0 artifact published.

So we need to ensure those prerequisites before health-check.

Also note there are other flags like maintenance_window_open etc but they might not be needed directly except as dependencies for setting deeper flags.

Let's examine flag hierarchy:

depth_flag_0 depends on flag_0 (maintenance_window_open?) Wait mapping: Flags list includes flag_0 (maintenance_window_open), flag_1 (secrets_synced), depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on), depth_flag_1 (backup_taken), depth_flag_2 (quota_raised), depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open), depth_flag_4 (secrets_synced).

Interesting duplication: There's both flag_0 and depth_flag_3 named same concept maybe different layers.

Set_flag_0 sets flag_0 (maintenance_window_open). No precondition besides being false.

set_depth_flag_0 sets depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on) requiring flag_0 first.

set_depth_flag_1 sets depth_flag_1 (backup_taken) requiring depth_flag_0 first.

set_depth_flag_2 sets depth_flag_2 (quota_raised) requiring depth_flag_1 first.

set_depth_flag_3 sets depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open) requiring depth_flag_2 first.

set_depth_flag_4 sets depth_flag_4 (secrets_synced) requiring depth_flag_3 first.

Thus chain: flag_0 -> depth_flag_0 -> depth_flag_1 -> depth_flag_2 -> depth_flag_3 -> depth_flag_4.

All start false presumably. Need to set them sequentially.

Additionally, health-check also requires art_0 artifact published.

We need to build and publish art_0.

Build artifact: build_art_0 (build artifact) requires artifact absent. Currently release-image artifact does not exist yet (absent). So we can run build_art_0 then publish_art_0.

Publish artifact: publish_art_0 requires artifact built.

Thus steps: build_art_0, publish_art_0.

Now ordering: Could do flag chain interleaved with artifact building, doesn't matter.

Need to respect max 24 calls, fine.

Sequence:

1. advance_0 (provision svc_0)
2. advance_1 (configure svc_0)
3. advance_2 (deploy svc_0)
   At this point service deployed.

But health-check later will require depth_flag_4 and art_0 published. Let's get those ready earlier perhaps before deploying? Not required by deploy, only health-check needs them. But could set flags anytime when preconditions satisfied.

Flag chain preconditions: each set_* requires previous flag set.

Start: all flags false.

To set flag_0: set_flag_0 (no precondition aside from false). Then set_depth_flag_0 requires flag_0 true. Then set_depth_flag_1 requires depth_flag_0 true. Then set_depth_flag_2 requires depth_flag_1 true. Then set_depth_flag_3 requires depth_flag_2 true. Then set_depth_flag_4 requires depth_flag_3 true.

Thus we need six set_flag calls.

Potentially we could interleave with artifact steps.

Now final step: advance_3 (health-check svc_0) requires service deployed, depth_flag_4 true, art_0 published.

Thus after we have done all prerequisite flags and artifact publishing, we can health-check.

Check if any other constraints: health-check also requires depth_flag_4 flag set (we will set) and art_0 artifact published.

No other preconditions.

Thus overall plan:

Steps:

1. advance_0 (svc_0) // provision
2. advance_1 (svc_0) // configure
3. advance_2 (svc_0) // deploy
4. set_flag_0 (flag_0) // maintenance_window_open
5. set_depth_flag_0 (depth_flag_0) // feature_gate_on
6. set_depth_flag_1 (depth_flag_1) // backup_taken
7. set_depth_flag_2 (depth_flag_2) // quota_raised
8. set_depth_flag_3 (depth_flag_3) // maintenance_window_open (again)
9. set_depth_flag_4 (depth_flag_4) // secrets_synced
10. build_art_0 (artifact art_0)
11. publish_art_0 (artifact art_0)
12. advance_3 (svc_0) // health-check

That's 12 calls.

Check preconditions at each step given evolving state.

Initial state: webhooks-0 down, cache-1 down, artifacts absent, flags false.

Step1: advance_0 svc_0 precondition: service down. True. After: svc_0 provisioned.

Step2: advance_1 svc_0 precondition: service provisioned. True. After: configured.

Step3: advance_2 svc_0 precondition: service configured. True. After: deployed.

Step4: set_flag_0 flag_0 precondition: flag_0 false. Initially false. After: true.

Step5: set_depth_flag_0 depth_flag_0 precondition: depth_flag_0 false, requires flag_0 true. Now flag_0 true, ok. After: depth_flag_0 true.

Step6: set_depth_flag_1 depth_flag_1 precondition: depth_flag_1 false, requires depth_flag_0 true. OK. After true.

Step7: set_depth_flag_2 depth_flag_2 precondition: depth_flag_2 false, requires depth_flag_1 true. OK. After true.

Step8: set_depth_flag_3 depth_flag_3 precondition: depth_flag_3 false, requires depth_flag_2 true. OK. After true.

Step9: set_depth_flag_4 depth_flag_4 precondition: depth_flag_4 false, requires depth_flag_3 true. OK. After true.

Step10: build_art_0 artifact art_0 precondition: artifact absent. Initially absent. After: built.

Step11: publish_art_0 artifact art_0 precondition: artifact built. After step10 built true. After: published.

Step12: advance_3 svc_0 precondition: service deployed, depth_flag_4 true, art_0 published. All satisfied. After: healthy.

Goal achieved.

Check duplicate flag names: flag_0 and depth_flag_3 both named maintenance_window_open but separate. That's fine.

We used exactly the tool IDs as given.

Make sure to output JSON array with objects containing "tool" and "args". Args keys: For provision/configure/deploy/health-check: "service": "<service id>" e.g., "svc_0". For set_flag: "flag": "<flag id>" where flag IDs correspond to entity IDs: flag_0, depth_flag_0,... as listed. For build_artifact/publish_artifact: "artifact": "<artifact id>" i.e., "art_0".

Thus produce:

[
 {"tool":"advance_0","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
 {"tool":"advance_1","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
 {"tool":"advance_2","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
 {"tool":"set_flag_0","args":{"flag":"flag_0"}},
 {"tool":"set_depth_flag_0","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_0"}},
 {"tool":"set_depth_flag_1","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_1"}},
 {"tool":"set_depth_flag_2","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_2"}},
 {"tool":"set_depth_flag_3","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_3"}},
 {"tool":"set_depth_flag_4","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_4"}},
 {"tool":"build_art_0","args":{"artifact":"art_0"}},
 {"tool":"publish_art_0","args":{"artifact":"art_0"}},
 {"tool":"advance_3","args":{"service":"svc_0"}}
]

Check count: 12 <=24.

Return only JSON array.