Record 5218e1a580d14ebf8db9a2c39f404334

We need to produce a JSON array of tool calls that will achieve the goal: search-0 must be healthy (i.e., at least healthy state), notifier-1 must be configured (i.e., at least configured). Starting state:

- registry-2 is down (not provisioned). That's svc_2.
- No release-image built (artifact art_0 not built).
- No db-migration built (artifact art_1 not built).
- maintenance_window_open flag never enabled after last reset. That's flag_0 (maintenance_window_open) is false.
- notifier-1 was fully torn down and not touched since. That means it's down? Probably not provisioned, not configured. It's not provisioned. So svc_1 is down.
- secrets_synced flag is off (flag_1 false).
- search-0 is down (not provisioned). That's svc_0 down.
- The interleave_window flag (flag_interleave_2) is not mentioned; likely false initially.

We need to bring search-0 to healthy, notifier-1 to configured.

We have tools:

- provision: moves service from down to provisioned.
- configure: moves from provisioned to configured (requires flag_interleave_2 open).
- deploy: moves from configured to deployed.
- health-check: moves from deployed to healthy (requires flag_interleave_2 open).
- open_interleave_window: opens the shared interleave window flag (presumably sets flag_interleave_2 to true). No args.

Flags specifics: flag_interleave_2 must be open for configure and health-check. Also some other steps may require it.

We also have flags flag_0 (maintenance_window_open) and flag_1 (secrets_synced). They may be required for some steps? Not mentioned in tool descriptions; only some steps require specific flag to be set or artifact published. The description says "Some advance steps additionally require a specific flag to be set or a specific artifact to be published before they may fire." But we need to check each tool's own description for which specific gate applies. The tool descriptions given do not mention any such requirement; they just mention that health-check requires flag_interleave_2 open. configure also requires flag_interleave_2 open. No mention of needing maintenance_window_open or secrets_synced for any tool. However, maybe there are hidden requirements: maybe deploy requires artifact published? Not mentioned. But the general rule: "An artifact can only be published once it has been built." But we have no tool to publish; maybe we need to build artifacts? Not given. There's no build tool listed. So maybe we cannot build artifacts; but the goal does not require artifacts to be built; only that they may be required as gates for some steps. Since no tool mentions needing artifacts, we can ignore.

Thus we need to:

- Provision search-0 (svc_0) from down to provisioned.
- Then configure search-0 (requires flag_interleave_2 open). So we need to open_interleave_window first (sets flag_interleave_2 true). Then configure svc_0.
- Then deploy search-0 (from configured to deployed). No extra requirements.
- Then health-check search-0 (requires flag_interleave_2 open, which is already open). That will move to healthy.

- For notifier-1 (svc_1), we need to get it to configured. Steps: provision svc_1 (down to provisioned). Then configure svc_1 (requires flag_interleave_2 open). So we need to ensure flag_interleave_2 is open before configuring. Since we will open it earlier, that's fine. Then we may stop; we don't need to deploy or health-check notifier-1, just configured.

Thus plan:

1. open_interleave_window (no args) – opens flag_interleave_2.
2. provision svc_0 (search-0).
3. configure svc_0 (requires flag_interleave_2 open) – done after step 1.
4. deploy svc_0.
5. health-check svc_0.

6. provision svc_1 (notifier-1).
7. configure svc_1.

That's 7 tool calls. Ensure ordering respects dependencies: provision before configure, configure before deploy, deploy before health-check. Also need flag_interleave_2 open before configure and health-check. So we open it first. Then we can provision svc_0, then configure svc_0, then deploy svc_0, then health-check svc_0. Meanwhile, we also need to provision svc_1 and configure svc_1. The ordering can be interleaved but must respect that configure for svc_1 also requires flag_interleave_2 open, which is already open. So we can do provision svc_1 after opening, then configure svc_1. Could do after health-check or before; any order as long as flag is open.

We must not exceed 14 calls; we are using 7.

We must output JSON array of objects with "tool" and "args". Use exact tool ids:

- open_interleave_window (id: open_interleave_window) – no args.
- adva-nce_0 (provision) – param service: service (entity id). So args: {"service":"svc_0"}.
- adva_nce_1 (configure) – param service: service. So args: {"service":"svc_0"}.
- adva-nce_0? Wait deploy tool id is adva-nce_0? Actually catalog: "adva-nce_0 | name: deploy | params: service: service". So tool id is adva-nce_0. Then configure tool id is adva_nce_1 (note underscore vs dash). Then health-check tool id is adva-nce_3. Provision tool id is adva-nce_0? Wait they gave "adva-nce_0 | name: provision". Actually they listed:

- id: adva-nce_0 | name: provision | params: service: service
- id: adva-nce_0? No, they also have "adva-nce_0 | name: deploy". Hmm they reused id? Let's parse:

Catalog:

- id: adva-nce_2 | name: deploy | params: service: service
- id: adva-nce_0 | name: provision | params: service: service
- id: decoy_o0 | name: audit_logs | params: service: service
- id: adva_nce_3 | name: health-check | params: service: service
- id: adva-nce_1 | name: configure | params: service: service
- id: open_interleave_window | name: open_interleave_window | params: (no args)

Thus:

- provision tool id: adva-nce_0
- configure tool id: adva-nce_1
- deploy tool id: adva-nce_2
- health-check tool id: adva_nce_3 (note underscore after adva_nce)
- open_interleave_window tool id: open_interleave_window

Thus we need to use correct ids.

Our plan steps with ids:

1. open_interleave_window (no args) -> {"tool":"open_interleave_window","args":{}}
2. provision svc_0 -> {"tool":"adva-nce_0","args":{"service":"svc_0"}}
3. configure svc_0 -> {"tool":"adva-nce_1","args":{"service":"svc_0"}}
4. deploy svc_0 -> {"tool":"adva-nce_2","args":{"service":"svc_0"}}
5. health-check svc_0 -> {"tool":"adva_nce_3","args":{"service":"svc_0"}}
6. provision svc_1 -> {"tool":"adva-nce_0","args":{"service":"svc_1"}}
7. configure svc_1 -> {"tool":"adva-nce_1","args":{"service":"svc_1"}}

Check that configure for svc_1 also requires flag_interleave_2 open; it's already open.

Thus JSON array of these 7 objects.

Make sure no extra whitespace? Probably fine.

Output only JSON array, no extra text.

Thus final answer:

[
  {"tool":"open_interleave_window","args":{}},
  {"tool":"adva-nce_0","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
  {"tool":"adva-nce_1","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
  {"tool":"adva-nce_2","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
  {"tool":"adva_nce_3","args":{"service":"svc_0"}},
  {"tool":"adva-nce_0","args":{"service":"svc_1"}},
  {"tool":"adva-nce_1","args":{"service":"svc_1"}}
]

Check that we used correct id for health-check: adva_nce_3 (with underscore). Yes.

Thus final.