Record 36a242c6e6ef4972b7f5c6bd1f633685

PASS

Verdict and provenance first; raw prompt/response/reasoning below, collapsed.

✓PASSanswered "cafeteria" · model Nemotron 3 Super 120B

finish_reason: stop · tokens in/out: 171/537 · cost: $0.000255 · latency: 3669.8 ms

belieftemplatestop

verifier_detail: kind=belief;campaign=1;adversarial=1;traps=final_true_state,last_mentioned_location,last_witnessed_by_anyone;foil_score=3.0

trap kind(s) this world was seeded for: final_true_statelast_mentioned_locationlast_witnessed_by_anyone

lineage: 36a242c6

← prev trial · trial 111 of 160 · next trial →

Prompt 531 chars · 171 tokens in

At 8:00, Petra brought the old tablet over to the cafeteria. At 8:00, Iris was nearby and saw this happen. At 8:01, Jamal took the old tablet and placed it in the print room. At 8:02, she moved the large basket into the print room. At 8:03, Petra carried the large basket to the cafeteria. At 8:04, she reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:05, Iris refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:06, she checked their email.

Where does Iris believe the old tablet is? Answer with only the location name (or 'unknown' if they have no belief).

Response 537 tokens out · finish: stop


cafeteria

Reasoning 2,139 chars

Model reasoning

We need to parse scenario. Determine what Iris believes about where the old tablet is at each time based on her observations.

Given statements:

- At 8:00, Petra brought the old tablet over to the cafeteria.
- At 8:00, Iris was nearby and saw this happen.

Thus Iris observed that Petra brought the old tablet to the cafeteria at 8:00. So after seeing that, Iris would believe the tablet is now in the cafeteria (since she saw Petra bring it there).

- At 8:01, Jamal took the old tablet and placed it in the print room.

Iris did not see this; we don't know if she knows about it. She might not be aware unless later told. The problem likely assumes Iris's belief updates only based on what she directly observes or hears? Usually these puzzles assume agents update beliefs based on events they witness. If they didn't witness an event, they retain previous belief unless they get info.

Thus Iris still believes tablet is in cafeteria because she hasn't seen it moved.

- At 8:02, "she moved the large basket into the print room." Who is "she"? Likely refers to Iris? Let's check context: earlier sentences: At 8:00, Petra... At 8:00, Iris... At 8:01, Jamal... At 8:02, she moved the large basket into the print room. Since subject changed from Jamal to "she", could refer to Iris (the last female mentioned before is Iris). Yes, Iris moves the large basket into the print room.

- At 8:03, Petra carried the large basket to the cafeteria.

- At 8:04, she reorganized some papers on the desk. Who is "she"? Could be Iris again? Or maybe Petra? Need to track pronouns. After 8:03, Petra carried the large basket to the cafeteria. Then at 8:04, "she" could be Iris again (subject ambiguous). But typical pattern: after describing actions of different people, pronoun refers to last mentioned person of that gender? Might be Iris again. However, we may not need that for tablet belief.

- At 8:05, Iris refilled a cup of coffee.

- At 8:06, she checked their email. Again "she" likely Iris.

Thus Iris never sees the tablet being moved by Jamal. So she still believes it's in cafeteria.

Thus answer: cafeteria.

Return just location name.

Realized dims 7

dim	value
context_length	7.0
coreference	1.0
distractors	2.0
entity_state	2.0
foil_divergence	3.0
temporal	0.0
witness_gap	1.0

Latent params 6

param	value
chain_length	2.0
coref_pressure	0.0
distractor_events	2.0
filler_events	2.0
scramble	0.0
witness_cutoff	0.45