Data to …… trials

Record 302ed6b991424c19b540fad6fcc3c737

FAIL

Verdict and provenance first; raw prompt/response/reasoning below, collapsed.

✕FAILanswered "unknown" · model Nemotron 3 Super 120B

finish_reason: stop · tokens in/out: 213/452 · cost: $0.000220 · latency: 3375.9 ms

belieftemplatestop

verifier_detail: kind=belief;campaign=1

lineage: 302ed6b9

← prev trial · trial 74 of 265 · next trial →

Why did it fail? Nemotron 3 Ultra · live on Nebius Token Factory

Ultra reads the prompt, this answer, the verified correct answer and the difficulty settings, then explains the mistake. The verifier's own classification is shown next to it for comparison.

Prompt 667 chars · 213 tokens in
At 8:00, Jamal brought the green box over to the library. At 8:01, he took the green box and placed it in the utility closet. At 8:02, Aria moved the cracked wrench into the greenhouse. At 8:03, Quentin brought the cracked wrench over to the library. At 8:04, Cyrus reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:05, Quentin refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:06, Elena checked their email. At 8:07, Aria checked their email. At 8:08, Xiomara reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:09, Lena made a quick phone call. At 8:10, Elena made a quick phone call.

Where does Elena believe the green box is? Answer with only the location name (or 'unknown' if they have no belief).
Response 452 tokens out · finish: stop

unknown
Reasoning 2,162 chars
Model reasoning
We need to determine what Elena believes about the location of the green box based on events up to her knowledge timeline. The scenario gives timestamps for actions by various people. We must infer each person's beliefs given their observations. Usually these puzzles assume that individuals know only what they directly observed or were told; we need to track knowledge propagation? However there is no communication described except maybe implied that they see each other's actions? Typically in such "belief" puzzles, each person knows the locations of objects they have interacted with or observed being moved, unless they are told otherwise. There's no explicit communication, so we assume each person only knows about actions they performed or witnessed directly. But do they witness others' actions? The statements are just events; we don't know who observed what. Usually in these puzzles, we assume that each person knows the location of objects they have moved themselves, and they also know the location of objects they have seen being moved (if they were present). But we lack info about who saw whom.

Maybe the assumption is that each person knows the location of objects they have personally handled, and they have no other info. So Elena's belief about green box: She never interacted with green box. She checked email at 8:06, made a quick phone call at 8:10. She never saw or moved green box. So she has no belief => unknown.

But perhaps there is an assumption that everyone knows the initial location? Not given. Could be that initially green box was somewhere? Not stated. At 8:00 Jamal brought the green box over to the library. That implies before 8:00 it was somewhere else (maybe not known). At 8:01 he took it and placed it in utility closet. So after 8:01 it's in utility closet. No further moves of green box mentioned. So final location is utility closet. Who knows that? Jamal knows because he moved it. Others may not unless they observed. Did anyone observe Jamal moving it? Not stated. So Elena likely doesn't know.

Thus answer: unknown.

Check if any other person might have told Elena? No communication.

Thus output: unknown.
Realized dims 5
dimvalue
context_length11.0
coreference9.0
distractors2.0
entity_state2.0
temporal0.0
Latent params 5
paramvalue
chain_length2.0
coref_pressure5.0
distractor_events2.0
filler_events2.0
scramble0.0