Data to …… trials

Record 22975408eae946eb8f22d8c4a8f61418

PASS

Verdict and provenance first; raw prompt/response/reasoning below, collapsed.

✓PASSanswered "mail room" · model Nemotron 3 Super 120B

finish_reason: stop · tokens in/out: 184/513 · cost: $0.000246 · latency: 4057.5 ms

belieftemplatestop

verifier_detail: kind=belief;campaign=1;adversarial=1;traps=final_true_state,last_mentioned_location,last_witnessed_by_anyone;foil_score=3.0

trap kind(s) this world was seeded for: final_true_statelast_mentioned_locationlast_witnessed_by_anyone

lineage: 22975408

← prev trial · trial 62 of 160 · next trial →

Prompt 570 chars · 184 tokens in
At 8:00, Gideon carried the shiny tablet to the mail room. At 8:00, David was nearby and saw this happen. At 8:01, Elena brought the shiny tablet over to the atrium. At 8:02, Gideon took the worn box and placed it in the kitchen. At 8:03, he took the worn box and placed it in the atrium. At 8:04, David reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:05, Sana refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:06, he checked their email. At 8:07, Elena checked their email.

Where does David believe the shiny tablet is? Answer with only the location name (or 'unknown' if they have no belief).
Response 513 tokens out · finish: stop

mail room
Reasoning 1,904 chars
Model reasoning
We need to parse scenario: characters: Gideon, David, Elena, Sana. Actions:

- At 8:00, Gideon carried the shiny tablet to the mail room.
- At 8:00, David was nearby and saw this happen.
Thus at 8:00, David sees Gideon carrying shiny tablet to mail room. So David believes after seeing that event, the shiny tablet is now in the mail room (since he observed him carry it there).

- At 8:01, Elena brought the shiny tablet over to the atrium.
But did David see that? Not mentioned; we assume not unless indicated. He might not know about Elena moving it because not stated he saw or heard. The problem likely tests knowledge tracking: David's belief based on what he observed. He observed only the first action (Gideon carrying tablet to mail room) at 8:00. After that, he may not have seen subsequent moves. Unless later actions are observed by him indirectly? Let's check each timestamp for David involvement:

- 8:00: David nearby and saw this happen (the tablet being carried to mail room).
- 8:04: David reorganized some papers on the desk. No mention of seeing tablet.
- 8:06: "he checked their email." Who is "he"? Could be David? Actually ambiguous pronoun. Prior subject list: Gideon, David, Elena, Sana. At 8:05 Sana refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:06, he checked their email. Likely refers to David? But could be Gideon? Usually pronouns refer to last male subject? Last male before 8:06 is Gideon? Actually timeline: 8:00 Gideon, David; 8:01 Elena; 8:02 Gideon; 8:03 Gideon; 8:04 David; 8:05 Sana; 8:06 he... The last male mentioned before 8:06 is David (at 8:04). So "he" likely David. Then at 8:07, Elena checked their email.

Thus David didn't observe any further tablet movement after 8:00. So his belief remains that the shiny tablet is in the mail room (where he saw Gideon take it). Unless he inferred something else? No.

Thus answer: mail room.

Return just location name: "mail room".
Realized dims 7
dimvalue
context_length8.0
coreference2.0
distractors2.0
entity_state2.0
foil_divergence3.0
temporal0.0
witness_gap1.0
Latent params 6
paramvalue
chain_length2.0
coref_pressure1.0
distractor_events2.0
filler_events2.0
scramble0.0
witness_cutoff0.0