Data to …… trials

Record 1995cd44de7b465eb3b6e91b76f449bd

FAIL

Verdict and provenance first; raw prompt/response/reasoning below, collapsed.

✕FAILanswered "unknown" · model Nemotron 3 Super 120B

finish_reason: stop · tokens in/out: 147/505 · cost: $0.000239 · latency: 3426.3 ms

belieftemplatestop

verifier_detail: kind=belief;campaign=1

lineage: 1995cd44

← prev trial · trial 38 of 265 · next trial →

Why did it fail? Nemotron 3 Ultra · live on Nebius Token Factory

Ultra reads the prompt, this answer, the verified correct answer and the difficulty settings, then explains the mistake. The verifier's own classification is shown next to it for comparison.

Prompt 455 chars · 147 tokens in
At 8:02, Piers moved the red folder into the wine cellar. At 8:03, Clara brought the red folder over to the photo studio. At 8:01, she carried the small folder to the wine cellar. At 8:05, Piers refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:04, she reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:00, she brought the small folder over to the photo studio.

Where does Piers believe the small folder is? Answer with only the location name (or 'unknown' if they have no belief).
Response 505 tokens out · finish: stop

unknown
Reasoning 2,051 chars
Model reasoning
We need to parse statements and infer beliefs about where each person thinks items are located based on their actions. The question: "Where does Piers believe the small folder is?" We need to consider what Piers knows or believes given his observations/actions.

Given timeline:

- At 8:02, Piers moved the red folder into the wine cellar.
- At 8:03, Clara brought the red folder over to the photo studio.
- At 8:01, she [Clara] carried the small folder to the wine cellar.
- At 8:05, Piers refilled a cup of coffee.
- At 8:04, she [Clara] reorganized some papers on the desk.
- At 8:00, she [Clara] brought the small folder over to the photo studio.

Thus we have two mentions of small folder by Clara:
- At 8:00: Clara brought the small folder over to the photo studio.
- At 8:01: Clara carried the small folder to the wine cellar.

So according to Clara's actions, at 8:00 she took it to photo studio; then at 8:01 she took it to wine cellar. So after 8:01, the small folder ends up in wine cellar (assuming she moves it there from wherever it was). However, note that at 8:00 she brought it to photo studio; maybe she had it before? Not clear.

Now Piers never interacts with small folder directly. He only sees moving red folder etc. Does he know about small folder movements? Possibly not unless observed. The problem likely tests reasoning about knowledge: If an agent didn't witness an action, they may not know its location. Since Piers never saw any action involving small folder, he has no belief about its location (unless inferred from other info like default assumption?). Usually these puzzles assume agents only know about actions they performed or observed. There's no mention of Piers observing Clara's actions. So Piers has no belief => answer "unknown".

But check if any indirect inference: At 8:02 Piers moved red folder into wine cellar. At 8:03 Clara moved red folder to photo studio. That might indicate that Piers knows red folder location changed but not small folder. No link.

Thus answer: unknown.

Return just "unknown".
Realized dims 5
dimvalue
context_length6.0
coreference0.0
distractors2.0
entity_state2.0
temporal0.5333333333333333
Latent params 5
paramvalue
chain_length2.0
coref_pressure0.0
distractor_events2.0
filler_events2.0
scramble0.5