Record 13e4ba3abb794623a4520515c4a5eae9

We need to produce a sequence of tool calls leading to scheduler-0 healthy.

Current state:

- scheduler-0 (svc_0) is down (not yet provisioned)
- notifier-1 (svc_1) down
- artifacts absent? Actually they do not exist yet => both artifacts absent.
- flags all off: maintenance_window_open flag (flag_0?) Wait there's confusion: They list flags: flag_0 (maintenance_window_open), flag_1 (secrets_synced), depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on), depth_flag_1 (backup_taken), depth_flag_2 (quota_raised), depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open). There seems duplicate naming: flag_0 = maintenance_window_open, also depth_flag_3 = maintenance_window_open. Possibly two separate flags with same meaning but different IDs. We'll treat them as distinct booleans initially false.

Goal: service scheduler-0 must reach at least 'healthy' state.

To get healthy we need to run health-check (advance_o3) which moves service from deployed to healthy, precondition: service must be deployed, requires depth_flag_3 flag set, requires art_0 artifact published.

Thus steps:

1. Ensure scheduler-0 goes through provision -> configured -> deployed -> healthy.

Provision: advance_o0 (provision) param service: svc_0. Precondition: service down. Currently down, ok.

Configure: advance_o1 (configure) param svc_0. Precondition: service configured? Actually moves from provisioned to configured. So after provision, service becomes provisioned. Then configure works.

Deploy: advance_o2 (deploy) param svc_0. Precondition: service configured. After configure, service becomes configured, then deploy works.

Health-check: advance_o3 param svc_0. Precondition: service deployed, depth_flag_3 true, art_0 published.

So before health-check we need depth_flag_3 true and art_0 published.

Now we need to satisfy dependencies for setting depth_flag_3.

Depth flags chain:

depth_flag_0 (feature_gate_on): set by set_dep-th_flag_0 (id: set_dep-th_flag_0) requiring flag_0 first.

depth_flag_1 (backup_taken): set by set_depth_flag_o1 (id: set_depth_flag_o1) requiring depth_flag_0 first.

depth_flag_2 (quota_raised): set by set_dep-th_flag_2 (id: set_dep-th_flag_2) requiring depth_flag_1 first.

depth_flag_3 (maintenance_window_open): set by set_dep-th_flag_3 (id: set_dep-th_flag_3) requiring depth_flag_2 first.

Also note flag_0 (maintenance_window_open) can be set directly via set_flag_o0 (id: set_flag_o0) precondition false.

But we have duplication: flag_0 and depth_flag_3 both represent maintenance_window_open? Might be separate but we only need depth_flag_3 true for health-check. To set depth_flag_3 we need depth_flag_2 true etc., ultimately need flag_0 true as base? Let's see chain:

set_dep-th_flag_0 requires flag_0 first. So we need flag_0 true before we can set depth_flag_0.

Then set_depth_flag_o1 requires depth_flag_0 first.

Set_dep-th_flag_2 requires depth_flag_1 first.

Set_dep-th_flag_3 requires depth_flag_2 first.

Thus we need to set flag_0, then depth_flag_0, then depth_flag_1, then depth_flag_2, then depth_flag_3.

Alternatively maybe we could skip some if other paths? No.

Thus we need to set flag_0 via set_flag_o0.

Now artifact publishing: Need art_0 published. Artifact states: currently absent. Need to build then publish.

Build artifact: build_art_o0 (id: build_art_o0) param artifact: art_0. Precondition: artifact absent. After building, artifact becomes built.

Publish artifact: publis-h_art_0 (id: publis-h_art_0) param artifact: art_0. Precondition: artifact built.

Thus we need build then publish.

Now ensure ordering constraints: For health-check we need depth_flag_3 true and art_0 published. Also service deployed.

Thus overall sequence:

1. provision svc_0 (advance_o0)
2. configure svc_0 (advance_o1)
3. deploy svc_0 (advance_o2)
4. set flag_0 (set_flag_o0)
5. set depth_flag_0 (set_dep-th_flag_0)
6. set depth_flag_1 (set_depth_flag_o1)
7. set depth_flag_2 (set_dep-th_flag_2)
8. set depth_flag_3 (set_dep-th_flag_3)
9. build artifact art_0 (build_art_o0)
10. publish artifact art_0 (publis-h_art_0)
11. health-check svc_0 (advance_o3)

Check each precondition at time of call.

Let's simulate state changes.

Initial:

svc_0: down
svc_1: down
art_0: absent
art_1: absent
flag_0: false
flag_1: false
depth_flag_0: false
depth_flag_1: false
depth_flag_2: false
depth_flag_3: false

Step1: advance_o0 provision svc_0. Precondition: svc_0 down -> true. After: svc_0 provisioned.

Step2: advance_o1 configure svc_0. Precondition: svc_0 provisioned -> true. After: svc_0 configured.

Step3: advance_o2 deploy svc_0. Precondition: svc_0 configured -> true. After: svc_0 deployed.

Step4: set_flag_o0 flag_0. Precondition: flag_0 false -> true. After: flag_0 true.

Step5: set_dep-th_flag_0 depth_flag_0. Precondition: depth_flag_0 false AND requires flag_0 true. flag_0 true now. OK. After: depth_flag_0 true.

Step6: set_depth_flag_o1 depth_flag_1. Precondition: depth_flag_1 false AND requires depth_flag_0 true. depth_flag_0 true. OK. After: depth_flag_1 true.

Step7: set_dep-th_flag_2 depth_flag_2. Precondition: depth_flag_2 false AND requires depth_flag_1 true. depth_flag_1 true. OK. After: depth_flag_2 true.

Step8: set_dep-th_flag_3 depth_flag_3. Precondition: depth_flag_3 false AND requires depth_flag_2 true. depth_flag_2 true. OK. After: depth_flag_3 true.

Step9: build_art_o0 artifact art_0. Precondition: art_0 absent -> true. After: art_0 built.

Step10: publis-h_art_0 artifact art_0. Precondition: art_0 built -> true. After: art_0 published.

Step11: advance_o3 health-check svc_0. Precondition: svc_0 deployed (true), depth_flag_3 true (true), art_0 published (true). After: svc_0 healthy.

Goal satisfied.

All good. Number of calls = 11 <=22.

Need to output JSON array with objects {"tool":"<tool id>", "args":{...}}.

Tool IDs exactly as given:

- advance_o0
- advance_o1
- advance_o2
- set_flag_o0
- set_dep-th_flag_0
- set_depth_flag_o1
- set_dep-th_flag_2
- set_dep-th_flag_3
- build_art_o0
- publis-h_art_0
- advance_o3

Note hyphens and underscores: Some IDs have hyphens like "set_dep-th_flag_0". Must copy exactly.

Check each:

From catalog:

- id: advanc_e0? Actually they wrote "advance_o0" etc. Yes.

List:

advance_o0
advance_o1
advance_o2
set_flag_o0
set_dep-th_flag_0
set_depth_flag_o1
set_dep-th_flag_2
set_dep-th_flag_3
build_art_o0
publis-h_art_0
advance_o3

Make sure spelling: "publis-h_art_0" includes a hyphen after publis? Actually they wrote "publis-h_art_0". Yes.

Now produce JSON.

Array of objects.

Order as above.

Let's craft final answer.