Data to …… trials

Record 102779bde10e4c408276098fb95a46bc

PASS

Verdict and provenance first; raw prompt/response/reasoning below, collapsed.

✓PASSanswered "observation deck" · model Nemotron 3 Super 120B

finish_reason: stop · tokens in/out: 153/515 · cost: $0.000244 · latency: 3954.4 ms

belieftemplatestop

verifier_detail: kind=belief;campaign=1;adversarial=1;traps=final_true_state,last_mentioned_location,last_witnessed_by_anyone;foil_score=3.0

trap kind(s) this world was seeded for: final_true_statelast_mentioned_locationlast_witnessed_by_anyone

lineage: 102779bd

← prev trial · trial 30 of 160 · next trial →

Prompt 490 chars · 153 tokens in
At 8:00, Vera carried the old tablet to the observation deck. At 8:01, Iris moved the old tablet into the reception area. At 8:02, she brought the cracked tablet over to the reception area. At 8:03, she carried the cracked tablet to the west wing. At 8:04, she reorganized some papers on the desk. At 8:05, Aria refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:06, Vera checked their email.

Where does Vera believe the old tablet is? Answer with only the location name (or 'unknown' if they have no belief).
Response 515 tokens out · finish: stop

observation deck
Reasoning 2,075 chars
Model reasoning
We need to parse scenario and determine what Vera believes about location of old tablet based on her knowledge/observations.

Events:

- At 8:00, Vera carried the old tablet to the observation deck.
Thus at that moment, Vera knows she placed it there.

- At 8:01, Iris moved the old tablet into the reception area.
Vera may not be aware; unless she observed? Not stated. So after this event, Vera's belief might still be that it's in observation deck unless she saw Iris move it.

- At 8:02, "she" (who?) brought the cracked tablet over to the reception area. The pronoun ambiguous: likely refers to Iris? Actually earlier we had Iris moving old tablet. Then "she" could refer to Iris again? Or maybe Vera? Let's read: At 8:02, she brought the cracked tablet over to the reception area. Since previous subject was Iris, but then later at 8:03, "she carried the cracked tablet to the west wing." Could be same person as before (Iris) or perhaps Vera? However note that at 8:04, "she reorganized some papers on the desk." That seems like generic action by someone else (maybe Iris?). At 8:05, Aria refilled a cup of coffee. At 8:06, Vera checked their email.

We need to track who performed each action. Likely the narrative uses different characters: Vera, Iris, Aria. The pronouns "she" after Iris actions probably refer to Iris until a new named subject appears. But at 8:04, "she reorganized some papers on the desk." Could be Iris again. At 8:05, Aria refilled... At 8:06, Vera checked...

Thus Vera's knowledge: She knows she moved old tablet to observation deck at 8:00. After that, she didn't see any further movement of old tablet (unless she observed Iris moving it at 8:01). If she didn't see, she would still believe it's at observation deck. There's no indication she observed Iris moving it. So answer: observation deck.

But check if any other events involve old tablet after 8:01: No. Only Iris moved old tablet to reception area at 8:01. No further mention. So Vera's belief remains observation deck.

Thus answer: observation deck.

Return just location name.
Realized dims 7
dimvalue
context_length7.0
coreference3.0
distractors2.0
entity_state2.0
foil_divergence3.0
temporal0.0
witness_gap1.0
Latent params 6
paramvalue
chain_length2.0
coref_pressure0.0
distractor_events2.0
filler_events2.0
scramble0.0
witness_cutoff0.0