Data to …… trials

Breaking points

Each row is one capability, scored against a deterministic simulation that knows the right answer. Where a capability has a difficulty dial, the dial is turned up until the model stops passing, and the point where it stopped is reported in the task’s own units.

Verdict per model6 models
  • Gemma 4 31B QATBreaks (7) step-by-step execution with values to carry (11-call plans, 3 values to carry) · recovering from a failed call (12-call plans, 4 values to carry) · repairing stacked bugs (1 bugs) · fixing a bug across files (cause 1 calls away) · the same program over more files (8 files) · a code-graph tool · carried valuesSlips (10) belief tracking · misleading stories · long plans with look-alike tool names (16-call plans) · trap-laden catalogs (4 of 5 traps active) · spotting impossible tasks · repairing a bug (0 hidden checks) · belief against reality · exact ids against natural names · cause over symptom · consistencyHolds on 12 of 29 capabilities tested.
  • Gemma 3 27BBreaks (3) long plans with look-alike tool names (17-call plans) · trap-laden catalogs (4 of 5 traps active) · spotting impossible tasksSlips (5) tracking where things are · belief tracking · misleading stories · step-by-step execution with look-alike tool names (11-call plans) · semantic traps in code (5 of 6 traps active)Holds on 6 of 14 capabilities tested.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30BBreaks (2) long plans with look-alike tool names (13-call plans) · step-by-step execution with look-alike tool names (11-call plans)Slips (5) belief tracking · misleading stories · trap-laden catalogs (4 of 5 traps active) · spotting impossible tasks · recovering from a failed call (11-call plans, 2 values to carry)Holds on 4 of 11 capabilities tested.
  • Nemotron 3 Ultra 550BSlips (2) long plans with look-alike tool names (25-call plans) · spotting impossible tasksHolds on 6 of 8 capabilities tested.
  • Nemotron 3 Super 120BBreaks (1) long plans with look-alike tool names (24-call plans)Holds on 11 of 12 capabilities tested.
  • gpt-oss-120bHolds on all 4 capabilities tested.
BREAKSa level fell to 30% pass or below and stayed low (at most 40% from there up)DEGRADESa level fell to 75% or below; for single-rate rows, the 95% interval sits below 95%HOLDSneither, at every level testedNOT TESTEDno evidence yet
Strip cells, pass rate per level:under 50%50-75%75-90%90-97%97%+no scored trialsfaded cell: fewer than 5 scored trials▲ boundary levelgrade A strong · B moderate · C thin
I · Narrative6 models
II · Tool planning6 models
III · Interactive execution6 models
IV · Code tracing6 models
V · Code repair6 models
V · Code writing6 models
VI · Repository6 models
EF · Evidence fidelity6 models
Reliability6 models