Run camp-code-lookalike-gemma-001

Run camp-code-lookalike-gemma-001: 93% pass rate on code queries.

Of 56 scored trials (code query kind), the model passed 93% and failed 7%.

4 failure(s) recorded; failures not yet verified -- use "Verify failures" on this page (or scripts/verify_past_failures.py).

Diffuse weakness (below 90% but no outright flip) on: identifier_confusability (pass rate 89% at the high end), n_statements (pass rate 86% at the high end), n_variables (pass rate 89% at the high end), trace_length (pass rate 84% at the high end).

Notable failures

• record 6aad64e1 — asked "After this program runs, what is the value of `step`? Work through it carefully, then give the final answer on its own last line as `ANSWER: <python literal>`."
  expected: (unknown)
  actual: ANSWER: 13

  answer did not match the verified ground truth

• record 8ad82d45 — asked "After this program runs, what is the value of `bins`? Work through it carefully, then give the final answer on its own last line as `ANSWER: <python literal>`."
  expected: (unknown)
  actual: ANSWER: [9, 1, 2, 4, 52]

  answer did not match the verified ground truth

• record cd48bc4c — asked "After this program runs, what is the value of `extra`? Work through it carefully, then give the final answer on its own last line as `ANSWER: <python literal>`."
  expected: (unknown)
  actual: ANSWER: 26

  answer did not match the verified ground truth