Run camp-code-length-gemma-001

Run camp-code-length-gemma-001: 82% pass rate on code queries.

Of 56 scored trials (code query kind), the model passed 82% and failed 18%.

10 failure(s) recorded; failures not yet verified -- use "Verify failures" on this page (or scripts/verify_past_failures.py).

Diffuse weakness (below 90% but no outright flip) on: answer_size (pass rate 63% at the high end), max_nesting (pass rate 64% at the high end), n_statements (pass rate 62% at the high end), trace_length (pass rate 65% at the high end).

Notable failures

• record 56811879 — asked "After this program runs, what is the value of `bonus`? Work through it carefully, then give the final answer on its own last line as `ANSWER: <python literal>`."
  expected: (unknown)
  actual: ANSWER: 14

  answer did not match the verified ground truth

• record 2a50cd48 — asked "After this program runs, what is the value of `marks`? Work through it carefully, then give the final answer on its own last line as `ANSWER: <python literal>`."
  expected: (unknown)
  actual: ANSWER: [7, 1, 5, 6, 2, 4]

  answer did not match the verified ground truth

• record 9da507d1 — asked "After this program runs, what is the value of `depth`? Work through it carefully, then give the final answer on its own last line as `ANSWER: <python literal>`."
  expected: (unknown)
  actual: ANSWER: 12

  answer did not match the verified ground truth