II · Tool planning
Plans long tool sequences when tool names look alike
Nemotron 3 Super 120B
Finding:BREAKS· grade A(research conclusion)
Breaks at 24-call plans: 8/28 pass (was 6/7 at 11-call plans)
Boundary 24-call plans · held through 11-call plans
Pass rate by level
Dashed lines: a level at or below 30% pass counts toward BREAKS, at or below 75% toward DEGRADES. Labels above points: passed/scored.
| Level | Passed | Pass rate | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-call plans | 20/21 | 95% | |
| 11-call plans | 6/7 | 86% | |
| 14-call plans | 16/22 | 73% | |
| 16-call plans | 9/15 | 60% | |
| 18-call plans | 16/22 | 73% | |
| 19-call plans | 7/15 | 47% | |
| 21-call plans | 4/7 | 57% | |
| 23-call plans | 5/7 | 71% | |
| 24-call plans | 8/28 | 29% | ▲ boundary |
| 25-call plans | 2/7 | 29% |
Why it breaks
The model calls a tool that does not exist -- usually a misspelled look-alike of a real tool name.
in 96% of failures (25 failures at and beyond the boundary)
Example failure
Trial result: FAIL (one model answer)
FAILunknown_tool:step=10:set_dep-th_flag_9
[ {"tool":"set_flag_0","args":{"flag":"flag_0"}}, {"tool":"set_dep_th_flag_0","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_0"}}, {"tool":"set_dep-th_flag_1","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_1"}}, {"tool":"set_dep-th_flag_2","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_2"}}, {"tool":"set_depth_flag_o3","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_3"}}, {"tool":"set_dep-th_flag_4","args":{"flag":"depth_flag_4"}}, {"tool":"set_dep-th_flag_5","args":{"flag":"dEvidence
- Ground truthDeterministic simulation: the right answer is computed, not judged
- StatisticsWilson 95% interval 15%–47%
- Sample size28 scored trials at the boundary
- Fresh-seed confirmationNot run yet
- ReplicationNot run yet
Raw evidence